Skip to content

Request to Merge #1

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: parentebc64
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Request to Merge #1

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

maorethians
Copy link
Owner

@maorethians maorethians commented Nov 4, 2024

User description

Note

I'm currently writing a description for your pull request. I should be done shortly (<1 minute). Please don't edit the description field until I'm finished, or we may overwrite each other. If I find nothing to write about, I'll delete this message.


PR Type

enhancement


Description

  • Introduced extractEmailProvider method to retrieve the domain part of an email address.
  • Introduced extractEmailUsername method to retrieve the username part of an email address.
  • Added isFromEmailProvider method to verify if an email belongs to a specific provider.
  • Added isFromAnyOfEmailProviders method to verify if an email belongs to any provider in a given list.

Changes walkthrough 📝

Relevant files
Enhancement
RegexUtils.java
Add utility methods for email parsing and validation         

lib/utilcode/src/main/java/com/blankj/utilcode/util/RegexUtils.java

  • Added method to extract the domain part of an email.
  • Added method to extract the username part of an email.
  • Added method to check if an email is from a specific provider.
  • Added method to check if an email is from any of a list of providers.
  • +48/-0   

    💡 PR-Agent usage: Comment /help "your question" on any pull request to receive relevant information

    /**
         * Returns the domain part of a given Email address
         *
         * @param email The Email address. E.g Returns "protonmail.com" from the given Email "johnsmith@protonmail.com".
         * @return the domain part of a given Email address.
         */
        public static String extractEmailProvider(String email) {
            return email.substring(email.lastIndexOf("@") + 1);
        }
    
        /**
         * Returns the username part of a given Email address. E.g. Returns "johnsmith" from the given Email "johnsmith@protonmail.com".
         *
         * @param email The Email address.
         * @return the username part of a given Email address.
         */
        public static String extractEmailUsername(String email) {
            return email.substring(0, email.lastIndexOf("@"));
        }
    
    
        /**
         * Return whether a given Email address is on a specified Email provider. E.g. "johnsmith@protonmail.com" and "gmail.com" will return false.
         *
         * @param email The Email address.
         * @param emailProvider The Email provider to testify against.
         * @return {@code true}: yes<br>{@code false}: no
         */
        public static boolean isFromEmailProvider(String email, String emailProvider) {
            return extractEmailProvider(email).equalsIgnoreCase(emailProvider);
        }
    
        /**
         * Return whether a given Email address is on any of the specified Email providers list (array). E.g. Useful if you pass it a list of real Email provider services and check if the Email is a disposable Email or a real one.
         *
         * @param email The Email address.
         * @param emailProviders The list of Email providers to testify against.
         * @return {@code true}: yes<br>{@code false}: no
         */
        public static boolean isFromAnyOfEmailProviders(String email, String[] emailProviders) {
            return com.blankj.utilcode.util.ArrayUtils.contains(emailProviders, extractEmailProvider(email));
        }
    Copy link

    coderabbitai bot commented Nov 4, 2024

    Important

    Review skipped

    Auto reviews are disabled on base/target branches other than the default branch.

    Please check the settings in the CodeRabbit UI or the .coderabbit.yaml file in this repository. To trigger a single review, invoke the @coderabbitai review command.

    You can disable this status message by setting the reviews.review_status to false in the CodeRabbit configuration file.


    Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

    ❤️ Share
    🪧 Tips

    Chat

    There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

    • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
      • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
      • Generate unit testing code for this file.
      • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
    • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
      • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
      • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
    • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
      • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
      • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
      • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
      • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

    Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

    CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

    • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
    • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
    • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
    • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
    • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
    • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
    • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
    • @coderabbitai help to get help.

    Other keywords and placeholders

    • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
    • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
    • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

    CodeRabbit Configuration File (.coderabbit.yaml)

    • You can programmatically configure CodeRabbit by adding a .coderabbit.yaml file to the root of your repository.
    • Please see the configuration documentation for more information.
    • If your editor has YAML language server enabled, you can add the path at the top of this file to enable auto-completion and validation: # yaml-language-server: $schema=https://coderabbit.ai/integrations/schema.v2.json

    Documentation and Community

    • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
    • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
    • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

    Copy link

    qodo-merge-pro bot commented Nov 4, 2024

    PR-Agent was enabled for this repository. To continue using it, please link your git user with your CodiumAI identity here.

    PR Reviewer Guide 🔍

    Here are some key observations to aid the review process:

    ⏱️ Estimated effort to review: 2 🔵🔵⚪⚪⚪
    🧪 No relevant tests
    🔒 No security concerns identified
    ⚡ Recommended focus areas for review

    Potential NullPointerException
    The new methods don't handle null or empty email inputs, which could lead to NullPointerException or StringIndexOutOfBoundsException.

    Regex Usage
    The email parsing is done using string manipulation instead of regex, which might be less robust for complex email formats.

    Performance Concern
    The isFromAnyOfEmailProviders method uses ArrayUtils.contains, which might be inefficient for large arrays. Consider using a Set for better performance.

    Copy link

    qodo-merge-pro bot commented Nov 4, 2024

    PR-Agent was enabled for this repository. To continue using it, please link your git user with your CodiumAI identity here.

    PR Code Suggestions ✨

    Explore these optional code suggestions:

    CategorySuggestion                                                                                                                                    Score
    Possible issue
    Add input validation to prevent exceptions when processing invalid email addresses

    Handle potential null or empty input in the extractEmailProvider and
    extractEmailUsername methods to prevent NullPointerException or
    StringIndexOutOfBoundsException.

    lib/utilcode/src/main/java/com/blankj/utilcode/util/RegexUtils.java [50-62]

     public static String extractEmailProvider(String email) {
    +    if (email == null || email.isEmpty() || !email.contains("@")) {
    +        return "";
    +    }
         return email.substring(email.lastIndexOf("@") + 1);
     }
     
     public static String extractEmailUsername(String email) {
    +    if (email == null || email.isEmpty() || !email.contains("@")) {
    +        return "";
    +    }
         return email.substring(0, email.lastIndexOf("@"));
     }
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 9

    Why: This suggestion addresses a critical issue by preventing potential null pointer and index out of bounds exceptions, significantly improving the robustness and reliability of the email processing methods.

    9
    Enhancement
    Implement email format validation using a regular expression before extracting parts

    Use a regular expression to validate the email format before extracting parts to
    ensure more robust email handling.

    lib/utilcode/src/main/java/com/blankj/utilcode/util/RegexUtils.java [50-62]

    +private static final String EMAIL_REGEX = "^[A-Za-z0-9+_.-]+@[A-Za-z0-9.-]+$";
    +
     public static String extractEmailProvider(String email) {
    -    return email.substring(email.lastIndexOf("@") + 1);
    +    if (email != null && email.matches(EMAIL_REGEX)) {
    +        return email.substring(email.lastIndexOf("@") + 1);
    +    }
    +    return "";
     }
     
     public static String extractEmailUsername(String email) {
    -    return email.substring(0, email.lastIndexOf("@"));
    +    if (email != null && email.matches(EMAIL_REGEX)) {
    +        return email.substring(0, email.lastIndexOf("@"));
    +    }
    +    return "";
     }
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 8

    Why: This suggestion enhances the email validation process by using a regex pattern, which provides a more thorough check of email format before extraction, reducing the risk of processing invalid emails.

    8
    Implement case-insensitive comparison for email provider matching

    Consider using case-insensitive comparison for email providers in the
    isFromAnyOfEmailProviders method to improve matching accuracy.

    lib/utilcode/src/main/java/com/blankj/utilcode/util/RegexUtils.java [83-85]

     public static boolean isFromAnyOfEmailProviders(String email, String[] emailProviders) {
    -    return com.blankj.utilcode.util.ArrayUtils.contains(emailProviders, extractEmailProvider(email));
    +    String provider = extractEmailProvider(email).toLowerCase();
    +    for (String emailProvider : emailProviders) {
    +        if (provider.equalsIgnoreCase(emailProvider)) {
    +            return true;
    +        }
    +    }
    +    return false;
     }
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 7

    Why: This suggestion improves the accuracy of email provider matching by implementing case-insensitive comparison, which is important for consistent email handling across different systems and user inputs.

    7
    Performance
    Use a more efficient data structure for email provider lookup to improve performance

    Consider using a more efficient data structure like HashSet for email provider
    lookup in the isFromAnyOfEmailProviders method to improve performance for large
    lists of providers.

    lib/utilcode/src/main/java/com/blankj/utilcode/util/RegexUtils.java [83-85]

    -public static boolean isFromAnyOfEmailProviders(String email, String[] emailProviders) {
    -    return com.blankj.utilcode.util.ArrayUtils.contains(emailProviders, extractEmailProvider(email));
    +public static boolean isFromAnyOfEmailProviders(String email, Set<String> emailProviders) {
    +    return emailProviders.contains(extractEmailProvider(email).toLowerCase());
     }
    • Apply this suggestion
    Suggestion importance[1-10]: 6

    Why: This suggestion offers a performance optimization for large lists of email providers by using a HashSet, which can significantly improve lookup times compared to array-based searches.

    6

    💡 Need additional feedback ? start a PR chat

    Copy link

    @korbit-ai korbit-ai bot left a comment

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    Review Summary by Korbit AI

    Code Execution Comments

    • Implement null checks in isFromAnyOfEmailProviders to prevent crashes and improve method robustness.
    Files scanned
    File Path Reviewed
    lib/utilcode/src/main/java/com/blankj/utilcode/util/RegexUtils.java

    Explore our documentation to understand the languages and file types we support and the files we ignore.

    Need a new review? Comment /korbit-review on this PR and I'll review your latest changes.

    Korbit Guide: Usage and Customization

    Interacting with Korbit

    • You can manually ask Korbit to review your PR using the /korbit-review command in a comment at the root of your PR.
    • You can ask Korbit to generate a new PR description using the /korbit-generate-pr-description command in any comment on your PR.
    • Too many Korbit comments? I can resolve all my comment threads if you use the /korbit-resolve command in any comment on your PR.
    • Chat with Korbit on issues we post by tagging @korbit-ai in your reply.
    • Help train Korbit to improve your reviews by giving a 👍 or 👎 on the comments Korbit posts.

    Customizing Korbit

    • Check out our docs on how you can make Korbit work best for you and your team.
    • Customize Korbit for your organization through the Korbit Console.

    Current Korbit Configuration

    General Settings
    Setting Value
    Review Schedule Automatic excluding drafts
    Max Issue Count 10
    Automatic PR Descriptions
    Issue Categories
    Category Enabled
    Naming
    Database Operations
    Documentation
    Logging
    Error Handling
    Systems and Environment
    Objects and Data Structures
    Readability and Maintainability
    Asynchronous Processing
    Design Patterns
    Third-Party Libraries
    Performance
    Security
    Functionality

    Feedback and Support

    Comment on lines +83 to +85
    public static boolean isFromAnyOfEmailProviders(String email, String[] emailProviders) {
    return com.blankj.utilcode.util.ArrayUtils.contains(emailProviders, extractEmailProvider(email));
    }
    Copy link

    Choose a reason for hiding this comment

    The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

    category Functionality

    Add null checks to isFromAnyOfEmailProviders method.

    Tell me more

    The isFromAnyOfEmailProviders method should include null checks for its parameters. Currently, if either email or emailProviders is null, it could result in a NullPointerException. Consider adding checks at the beginning of the method to handle these cases, either by returning false or throwing an IllegalArgumentException with a descriptive message. This will improve the method's robustness and prevent unexpected crashes.

    Chat with Korbit by mentioning @korbit-ai, and give a 👍 or 👎 to help Korbit improve your reviews.

    Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
    Projects
    None yet
    Development

    Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

    2 participants