Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: merge similar excluded messages when unsat #26

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jan 31, 2024
Merged
Show file tree
Hide file tree
Changes from all commits
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
49 changes: 32 additions & 17 deletions src/problem.rs
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -47,6 +47,7 @@ impl Problem {
) -> ProblemGraph {
let mut graph = DiGraph::<ProblemNode, ProblemEdge>::default();
let mut nodes: HashMap<SolvableId, NodeIndex> = HashMap::default();
let mut excluded_nodes: HashMap<StringId, NodeIndex> = HashMap::default();

let root_node = Self::add_node(&mut graph, &mut nodes, SolvableId::root());
let unresolved_node = graph.add_node(ProblemNode::UnresolvedDependency);
Expand All @@ -58,8 +59,15 @@ impl Problem {
Clause::Excluded(solvable, reason) => {
tracing::info!("{solvable:?} is excluded");
let package_node = Self::add_node(&mut graph, &mut nodes, *solvable);
let conflict = ConflictCause::Excluded(*solvable, *reason);
graph.add_edge(root_node, package_node, ProblemEdge::Conflict(conflict));
let excluded_node = excluded_nodes
.entry(*reason)
.or_insert_with(|| graph.add_node(ProblemNode::Excluded(*reason)));

graph.add_edge(
package_node,
*excluded_node,
ProblemEdge::Conflict(ConflictCause::Excluded),
);
}
Clause::Learnt(..) => unreachable!(),
&Clause::Requires(package_id, version_set_id) => {
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -176,6 +184,8 @@ pub enum ProblemNode {
Solvable(SolvableId),
/// Node representing a dependency without candidates
UnresolvedDependency,
/// Node representing an exclude reason
Excluded(StringId),
}

impl ProblemNode {
Expand All @@ -185,6 +195,9 @@ impl ProblemNode {
ProblemNode::UnresolvedDependency => {
panic!("expected solvable node, found unresolved dependency")
}
ProblemNode::Excluded(_) => {
panic!("expected solvable node, found excluded node")
}
}
}
}
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -224,7 +237,7 @@ pub enum ConflictCause {
/// It is forbidden to install multiple instances of the same dependency
ForbidMultipleInstances,
/// The node was excluded
Excluded(SolvableId, StringId),
Excluded,
}

/// Represents a node that has been merged with others
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -302,9 +315,7 @@ impl ProblemGraph {
| ProblemEdge::Conflict(ConflictCause::Locked(_)) => {
"already installed".to_string()
}
ProblemEdge::Conflict(ConflictCause::Excluded(_, reason)) => {
format!("excluded because {}", pool.resolve_string(*reason))
}
ProblemEdge::Conflict(ConflictCause::Excluded) => "excluded".to_string(),
};

let target = match target {
Expand All @@ -322,6 +333,9 @@ impl ProblemGraph {
solvable_2.display(pool).to_string()
}
ProblemNode::UnresolvedDependency => "unresolved".to_string(),
ProblemNode::Excluded(reason) => {
format!("reason: {}", pool.resolve_string(reason))
}
};

write!(
Expand All @@ -346,7 +360,7 @@ impl ProblemGraph {
let mut maybe_merge = HashMap::new();
for node_id in graph.node_indices() {
let candidate = match graph[node_id] {
ProblemNode::UnresolvedDependency => continue,
ProblemNode::UnresolvedDependency | ProblemNode::Excluded(_) => continue,
ProblemNode::Solvable(solvable_id) => {
if solvable_id.is_root() {
continue;
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -415,12 +429,10 @@ impl ProblemGraph {

// Determine any incoming "exclude" edges to the node. This would indicate that the
// node is disabled for external reasons.
let excluding_edges = self.graph.edges_directed(nx, Direction::Incoming).any(|e| {
matches!(
e.weight(),
ProblemEdge::Conflict(ConflictCause::Excluded(_, _))
)
});
let excluding_edges = self
.graph
.edges_directed(nx, Direction::Incoming)
.any(|e| matches!(e.weight(), ProblemEdge::Conflict(ConflictCause::Excluded)));
if excluding_edges {
// Nodes with incoming disabling edges aren't installable
continue;
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -673,9 +685,12 @@ impl<'pool, VS: VersionSet, N: PackageName + Display, M: SolvableDisplay<VS, N>>
};

let excluded = graph
.edges_directed(candidate, Direction::Incoming)
.edges_directed(candidate, Direction::Outgoing)
.find_map(|e| match e.weight() {
ProblemEdge::Conflict(ConflictCause::Excluded(_, reason)) => {
ProblemEdge::Conflict(ConflictCause::Excluded) => {
let ProblemNode::Excluded(reason) = graph[e.target()] else {
unreachable!();
};
Some(reason)
}
_ => None,
Expand All @@ -695,7 +710,7 @@ impl<'pool, VS: VersionSet, N: PackageName + Display, M: SolvableDisplay<VS, N>>
writeln!(
f,
"{indent}{name} {version} is excluded because {reason}",
reason = self.pool.resolve_string(*excluded_reason)
reason = self.pool.resolve_string(excluded_reason)
)?;
} else if is_leaf {
writeln!(f, "{indent}{name} {version}")?;
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -795,7 +810,7 @@ impl<VS: VersionSet, N: PackageName + Display, M: SolvableDisplay<VS, N>> fmt::D
.display_candidates(self.pool, &[solvable_id])
)?;
}
ConflictCause::Excluded(_, _) => continue,
ConflictCause::Excluded => continue,
};
}
}
Expand Down
3 changes: 1 addition & 2 deletions tests/snapshots/solver__merge_excluded.snap
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -4,6 +4,5 @@ expression: "solve_snapshot(provider, &[\"a\"])"
---
The following packages are incompatible
|-- a * cannot be installed because there are no viable options:
|-- a 2 is excluded because it is externally excluded
|-- a 1 is excluded because it is externally excluded
|-- a 1 | 2 is excluded because it is externally excluded