Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Excessive index invalidation on product category relation removal #29886

Open
1 of 5 tasks
siimm opened this issue Sep 3, 2020 · 7 comments
Open
1 of 5 tasks

Excessive index invalidation on product category relation removal #29886

siimm opened this issue Sep 3, 2020 · 7 comments
Labels
Area: Catalog CD Issue recommended for the contribution day Component: Indexer Issue: Confirmed Gate 3 Passed. Manual verification of the issue completed. Issue is confirmed Issue: Format is valid Gate 1 Passed. Automatic verification of issue format passed Issue: Ready for Work Gate 4. Acknowledged. Issue is added to backlog and ready for development Priority: P2 A defect with this priority could have functionality issues which are not to expectations. Progress: ready for dev Reported on 2.3.3 Indicates original Magento version for the Issue report. Reproduced on 2.4.x The issue has been reproduced on latest 2.4-develop branch Severity: S1 Affects critical data or functionality and forces users to employ a workaround.

Comments

@siimm
Copy link
Contributor

siimm commented Sep 3, 2020

In M2 the indexers have their specific order, e.g. price index must be reindexed prior to fulltext index etc.

When magento invalidates indexes, it takes the order of indexes into account.
Before 2.3.5, when an index got invalidated, it looked at the next indexes that were after it and which ever were declared as dependent on current, got invalidated as well.
In 2.3.5 and greater version upon invalidation, the index looks “both-ways” the indexes that came before and after it and were dependent got invalidated.

In clean 2.3.3, catalog_category index and catalogsearch_fulltext index get invalidated when for an example a product is removed from a category.
In clean 2.3.5 and greater version also price indexer and catalogrule indexer get invalidated because of the previously described both ways lookup. (also additionally both target-rule indexers and inventory indexer can get invalidated, depending on their state - update on save or mview)

The cause of the change was some Magento's internal ticket about not finding a product on Elasticsearch: 31aebbf

On a heavy traffic webshop(1k-3k continuous concurrent users) with a lot of products (around 100k) it is not possible to allow rebuilding of such amount of indexes on each category removal from product, as for an example the fulltext index alone takes around 10 minutes to rebuild. Removing and adding products to categories is a fairly common operation on daily bases and with current codebase the webshop enters a continues reindexing and cache cleaning loop.

Preconditions (*)

  1. Magento 2.4.0 or Magento 2.3.5 (Also present in 2.4-develop)
  2. Set in Admin -> System -> Index Managment all indexers to be 'Update by schedule'

Steps to reproduce (*)

  1. Remove a category from product on admin panel product edit form

Expected result (*)

  1. No (or as less as possible) indexes completely invalidated

Actual result (*)

  1. 6 indexes completely invalidated - bin/magento i:status command shows invalidated: catalogrule_rule, catalogsearch_fulltext, catalog_category_product, inventory, catalog_product_price, cataloginventory_stock forcing next incremental indexer run to reindex all of them

Please provide Severity assessment for the Issue as Reporter. This information will help during Confirmation and Issue triage processes.

  • Severity: S0 - Affects critical data or functionality and leaves users without workaround.
  • Severity: S1 - Affects critical data or functionality and forces users to employ a workaround.
  • Severity: S2 - Affects non-critical data or functionality and forces users to employ a workaround.
  • Severity: S3 - Affects non-critical data or functionality and does not force users to employ a workaround.
  • Severity: S4 - Affects aesthetics, professional look and feel, “quality” or “usability”.
@m2-assistant
Copy link

m2-assistant bot commented Sep 3, 2020

Hi @siimm. Thank you for your report.
To help us process this issue please make sure that you provided the following information:

  • Summary of the issue
  • Information on your environment
  • Steps to reproduce
  • Expected and actual results

Please make sure that the issue is reproducible on the vanilla Magento instance following Steps to reproduce. To deploy vanilla Magento instance on our environment, please, add a comment to the issue:

@magento give me 2.4-develop instance - upcoming 2.4.x release

For more details, please, review the Magento Contributor Assistant documentation.

Please, add a comment to assign the issue: @magento I am working on this


⚠️ According to the Magento Contribution requirements, all issues must go through the Community Contributions Triage process. Community Contributions Triage is a public meeting.

🕙 You can find the schedule on the Magento Community Calendar page.

📞 The triage of issues happens in the queue order. If you want to speed up the delivery of your contribution, please join the Community Contributions Triage session to discuss the appropriate ticket.

🎥 You can find the recording of the previous Community Contributions Triage on the Magento Youtube Channel

✏️ Feel free to post questions/proposals/feedback related to the Community Contributions Triage process to the corresponding Slack Channel

@magento-engcom-team magento-engcom-team added the Issue: Format is valid Gate 1 Passed. Automatic verification of issue format passed label Sep 3, 2020
@engcom-Oscar engcom-Oscar self-assigned this Sep 8, 2020
@m2-assistant
Copy link

m2-assistant bot commented Sep 8, 2020

Hi @engcom-Oscar. Thank you for working on this issue.
In order to make sure that issue has enough information and ready for development, please read and check the following instruction: 👇

  • 1. Verify that issue has all the required information. (Preconditions, Steps to reproduce, Expected result, Actual result).

    DetailsIf the issue has a valid description, the label Issue: Format is valid will be added to the issue automatically. Please, edit issue description if needed, until label Issue: Format is valid appears.

  • 2. Verify that issue has a meaningful description and provides enough information to reproduce the issue. If the report is valid, add Issue: Clear Description label to the issue by yourself.

  • 3. Add Component: XXXXX label(s) to the ticket, indicating the components it may be related to.

  • 4. Verify that the issue is reproducible on 2.4-develop branch

    Details- Add the comment @magento give me 2.4-develop instance to deploy test instance on Magento infrastructure.
    - If the issue is reproducible on 2.4-develop branch, please, add the label Reproduced on 2.4.x.
    - If the issue is not reproducible, add your comment that issue is not reproducible and close the issue and stop verification process here!

  • 5. Add label Issue: Confirmed once verification is complete.

  • 6. Make sure that automatic system confirms that report has been added to the backlog.

@engcom-Oscar engcom-Oscar added Reproduced on 2.4.x The issue has been reproduced on latest 2.4-develop branch Component: Indexer Issue: Confirmed Gate 3 Passed. Manual verification of the issue completed. Issue is confirmed labels Sep 8, 2020
@ghost ghost unassigned engcom-Oscar Sep 8, 2020
@magento-engcom-team
Copy link
Contributor

✅ Confirmed by @engcom-Oscar
Thank you for verifying the issue. Based on the provided information internal tickets MC-37445 were created

Issue Available: @engcom-Oscar, You will be automatically unassigned. Contributors/Maintainers can claim this issue to continue. To reclaim and continue work, reassign the ticket to yourself.

@magento-engcom-team magento-engcom-team added the Issue: Ready for Work Gate 4. Acknowledged. Issue is added to backlog and ready for development label Sep 8, 2020
@sdzhepa sdzhepa added Priority: P2 A defect with this priority could have functionality issues which are not to expectations. Severity: S1 Affects critical data or functionality and forces users to employ a workaround. labels Sep 10, 2020
@sivaschenko sivaschenko added the CD Issue recommended for the contribution day label Oct 7, 2020
@magento-engcom-team magento-engcom-team added the Reported on 2.3.3 Indicates original Magento version for the Issue report. label Nov 13, 2020
@melnickforever
Copy link

Do you have any update for this issue ?

@AleksandrsZascirinskis
Copy link

Hey, Is there any updates, maybe some fixes that we can apply manually?

@siimm
Copy link
Contributor Author

siimm commented Dec 6, 2023

@AleksandrsZascirinskis
our way was to revert half of the dependancy processing. No problems encountered

--- Model/Indexer/DependencyDecorator-o.php	2020-05-14 15:23:25.000000000 +0200
+++ Model/Indexer/DependencyDecorator.php	2020-05-14 15:24:02.000000000 +0200
@@ -222,16 +222,9 @@
     public function invalidate()
     {
         $this->indexer->invalidate();
-        $currentIndexerId = $this->indexer->getId();
-        $idsToRunBefore = $this->dependencyInfoProvider->getIndexerIdsToRunBefore($currentIndexerId);
-        $idsToRunAfter = $this->dependencyInfoProvider->getIndexerIdsToRunAfter($currentIndexerId);
-
-        $indexersToInvalidate = array_unique(array_merge($idsToRunBefore, $idsToRunAfter));
-        foreach ($indexersToInvalidate as $indexerId) {
-            $indexer = $this->indexerRegistry->get($indexerId);
-            if (!$indexer->isInvalid()) {
-                $indexer->invalidate();
-            }
+        $dependentIndexerIds = $this->dependencyInfoProvider->getIndexerIdsToRunAfter($this->indexer->getId());
+        foreach ($dependentIndexerIds as $indexerId) {
+            $this->indexerRegistry->get($indexerId)->invalidate();
         }
     }

@xpoback
Copy link
Contributor

xpoback commented Feb 24, 2024

@siimm Thanks, that's what I was looking for.

It unbelievably annoying than when I want to rebuild an index (just one) the bunch of other indices has to be built before that. For example, when rebuilding the search index (catalogsearch_fulltext), five (5) others have to be rebuilt first (Category Products, Catalog Rule Product, Product EAV, Product Price and Catalog Product Rule).

@engcom-Hotel engcom-Hotel moved this to Ready for Development in High Priority Backlog Aug 19, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Area: Catalog CD Issue recommended for the contribution day Component: Indexer Issue: Confirmed Gate 3 Passed. Manual verification of the issue completed. Issue is confirmed Issue: Format is valid Gate 1 Passed. Automatic verification of issue format passed Issue: Ready for Work Gate 4. Acknowledged. Issue is added to backlog and ready for development Priority: P2 A defect with this priority could have functionality issues which are not to expectations. Progress: ready for dev Reported on 2.3.3 Indicates original Magento version for the Issue report. Reproduced on 2.4.x The issue has been reproduced on latest 2.4-develop branch Severity: S1 Affects critical data or functionality and forces users to employ a workaround.
Projects
Status: Ready for Development
Development

No branches or pull requests

9 participants