Skip to content

Comments

Update API and m9sweeper helm chart link#2

Open
jshoberg wants to merge 13 commits intomasterfrom
chart-updates
Open

Update API and m9sweeper helm chart link#2
jshoberg wants to merge 13 commits intomasterfrom
chart-updates

Conversation

@jshoberg
Copy link

No description provided.

@jasonWoodman
Copy link
Contributor

This looks pretty good aside from how you added the ClusterIssuer template. Files that dont get templated should go in the files directory, any files that get templated should go into a template directory. this is kind of an ansible standard, i think. Right now you are looping over all the *.j2 files to apply, i am not sure that is actually working?

@jshoberg
Copy link
Author

This looks pretty good aside from how you added the ClusterIssuer template. Files that dont get templated should go in the files directory, any files that get templated should go into a template directory. this is kind of an ansible standard, i think. Right now you are looping over all the *.j2 files to apply, i am not sure that is actually working?

I moved the ClusterIssuer templates into the templates dir, good catch, that was mostly a case of updating the self signed template in place.

As for looping over the files, I was following the pattern used for deploying the self-signed issuer, just adding steps to template out the files, and I can at least confirm that it works when destroying the self signed issuer and rerunning ansible

nginx_helm_chart_repo: "https://kubernetes.github.io/ingress-nginx"
nginx_helm_chart_version: "4.5.2"
nginx.prometheus_enabled: true
nginx_oci_subnet_id: ""
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Lets add a comment to this explaining what this field is for. Nothing too crazy, but at least mention that it is only needed when using the OCI platform.

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

added in a clarifying comment

@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
apiVersion: batch/v1beta1
apiVersion: batch/v1
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

nice, good catch. This should be fine as that new API was rolled out long enough ago

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants