Skip to content

Consistent language regarding "Uniform Access/Enhetlig Access" #663

@EdvinGroth

Description

@EdvinGroth

In the compendium under 4.2.1 in the first question it asks you to connect the concept "Uniform Access"(number 14) to a description but in the rest of the compendium it is always referred to as "Enhetlig Access". The rest of concepts are in swedish except for this one, if this is not intended i would recommend changing the question and the answer sheet to "Enhetlig Access" instead of "Uniform Access".

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    No labels
    No labels

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions