Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Documentation link is not working #389

Closed
svempati21 opened this issue Jul 3, 2023 · 7 comments · Fixed by #390
Closed

Documentation link is not working #389

svempati21 opened this issue Jul 3, 2023 · 7 comments · Fixed by #390

Comments

@svempati21
Copy link

Documentation type: [End-user documentation, wiki, code comments]
Documentation link
Improvements requested:
The link to the documentation isn't working.
Link (if available):
http://gh.lum.ai/odinson/

@myedibleenso
Copy link
Member

Thanks, @svempati21 , for opening this. Here is the new URL for the docs: https://docs.lum.ai/odinson/

@svempati21
Copy link
Author

Thank you! Sorry, I think it still isn't working though.

@myedibleenso myedibleenso reopened this Jul 5, 2023
@myedibleenso
Copy link
Member

Thanks for your patience, @svempati21 . Can you please try https://docs.lum.ai/odinson/ again?

@svempati21
Copy link
Author

It's working now. Thank you so much!

@svempati21 svempati21 reopened this Oct 5, 2023
@svempati21
Copy link
Author

It seems like the link to the documentation (at https://docs.lum.ai/odinson/) isn't working now.

github-actions bot added a commit that referenced this issue Oct 5, 2023
@myedibleenso
Copy link
Member

Hi, @svempati21 . Sorry about that. We changed it in the repo's side bar, but overlooked the README 😅

Here is the new link: https://lum.ai/odinson/docs/

@svempati21
Copy link
Author

Thank you!

github-actions bot added a commit to gcgbarbosa/odinson that referenced this issue May 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

2 participants