Skip to content

Fix #239 - interpolated action "update" don't get params "upsert" and… #385

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Feb 22, 2018

Conversation

dchauviere
Copy link
Contributor

This PR fixes a bug (issue #239) in case of interpolated action "update" where specific parameters 'upsert' and 'script' was not set !

@elasticsearch-release
Copy link

Jenkins standing by to test this. If you aren't a maintainer, you can ignore this comment. Someone with commit access, please review this and clear it for Jenkins to run; then say 'jenkins, test it'.

@suyograo
Copy link
Contributor

suyograo commented Mar 9, 2016

@dchauviere @Da-wei looks like you used a new GitHub account, so the CLA system did not recognize you. Can you please resign the CLA with this account "@dchauviere"

@dchauviere
Copy link
Contributor Author

@suyograo, I have signed the CLA. Is there a delay before check pass ?

@suyograo suyograo closed this Mar 9, 2016
@suyograo suyograo reopened this Mar 9, 2016
@suyograo suyograo closed this Mar 9, 2016
@suyograo suyograo reopened this Mar 9, 2016
@suyograo
Copy link
Contributor

suyograo commented Mar 9, 2016

@dchauviere all good now :)

@dchauviere
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks @suyograo, its better :)
travis-ci's build seems to randomly fail :

  • previous build failed for ES1.7.5 but succeed for ES2.2.0
  • last build failed for ES2.2.0 but succeed for ES1.7.5

I will try to reproduce ...

@sir4ur0n
Copy link

Hi folks,

Is there any progress on this PR please? The issue still happens in Logstash 2.3.2 :'(

Thank you for your contributions!

@dchauviere
Copy link
Contributor Author

@sir4ur0n @suyograo, with my previous comment, I think we should wait for #437 to be closed before this can be merged, but I have finished to work on it.

@phoenixgao
Copy link

@dchauviere #437 has been closed for one year, is this going to be merged?

Logshash 5.4.2 still has this issue

@ItamarBenjamin
Copy link

Hi can someone get this merged please? this bug is really problematic for many developers...

@dchauviere
Copy link
Contributor Author

@suyograo @andrewvc, do you expect anything from me for merging this ?
Should I rebase with master branch ?

@andrewvc
Copy link
Contributor

@dchauviere apologies for the delay, I've put it at the top of my todo list tomorrow

@rjsaran
Copy link

rjsaran commented Nov 1, 2017

@andrewvc Any plan to merge this in near future.

@@ -10,9 +10,9 @@ module Common
DOC_CONFLICT_CODE = 409

# When you use external versioning, you are communicating that you want
# to ignore conflicts. More obviously, since an external version is a
Copy link
Contributor Author

@dchauviere dchauviere Feb 21, 2018

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@guyboertje my editor seems to cleanup unneeded space, if its a problem for merging (or just reading changes), I can restore them

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No need to worry in this case.

@dchauviere
Copy link
Contributor Author

@guyboertje, could you review that your comments in #732 are well integrated here.

@guyboertje guyboertje self-requested a review February 22, 2018 08:49
@guyboertje guyboertje self-assigned this Feb 22, 2018
Copy link

@guyboertje guyboertje left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

@guyboertje
Copy link

Tests pass. Good to go.

@guyboertje guyboertje merged commit 7dde2de into logstash-plugins:master Feb 22, 2018
@ItamarBenjamin
Copy link

Guys thanks for getting this merged! any idea when the next release is due?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

10 participants