π¨ chore: fix vercel deployment error #1654
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
TheNameIsNigel
pushed a commit
to TheNameIsNigel/lobe-chat
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 20, 2024
|
π This PR is included in version 0.139.2 π The release is available on: Your semantic-release bot π¦π |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
π» εζ΄η±»ε | Change Type
π εζ΄θ―΄ζ | Description of Change
due to oven-sh/bun#9503 and oven-sh/bun#9489 (comment) , there is an install failure with bun@v1.0.32 and 1.0.33.
Vercel bump bun version to 1.0.32 then casue the deployment failed.
just temporarily lock bun version to 1.0.31 to avoid failure. fix #1651
π θ‘₯ε δΏ‘ζ― | Additional Information
bun install failure again after several months (#960).
Hello bun team, @Jarred-Sumner @dylan-conway @Electroid, can we have some methods to avoid this problem ever? Because the install failure will block lots of LobeChat self-hosting users to start their deployment.
If not, maybe we have to consider to switch back to pnpm π°