-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.4k
[libc++] Increase atomic_ref
's required alignment for small types
#99654
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
ldionne
merged 7 commits into
llvm:main
from
dalg24:increase_atomic_ref_required_alignment_of_small_types
Aug 1, 2024
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
7 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
8d1fc92
[libc++] Increase atomic_ref's required alignment for small types
dalg24 8545aeb
fixup! [libc++] Increase atomic_ref's required alignment for small types
dalg24 6027a62
Fix typo and follow the suggestion from the review
dalg24 056d4af
Fixup bool -> size_t
dalg24 e3b95d4
Merge branch 'main' of https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project into incr…
dalg24 edeef46
Follow James' suggestion and add aligned attribute to the pointer dat…
dalg24 976dbd9
Use alignas to make objects satisfy atomic_ref's alignement requirement
dalg24 File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think we should calculate the alignment using something like this?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I really like this, I think this directly translates to what we are actually trying to achieve (which is to calculate the smallest alignment that allows us to be lockfree).
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
That is not a valid implementation, because it causes the ABI of the type to change depending on the microarchitecture selection.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
TIL