- 
                Notifications
    You must be signed in to change notification settings 
- Fork 15k
[flang] Check for BIND(C) name conflicts with alternate entries #156563
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
          
     Merged
      
      
    
  
     Merged
                    Changes from all commits
      Commits
    
    
            Show all changes
          
          
            7 commits
          
        
        Select commit
          Hold shift + click to select a range
      
      2edba5c
              
                [flang] Check for BIND(C) name conflicts with alternate entries
              
              
                eugeneepshteyn 440fe5c
              
                clang-format
              
              
                eugeneepshteyn 5ffa159
              
                Restored CheckHelper::CheckGlobalName() to original implementation.
              
              
                eugeneepshteyn eee099c
              
                Modified LIT test to test the case of multiple entries with conflicti…
              
              
                eugeneepshteyn 62561c2
              
                Merge branch 'llvm:main' into fix-bindc-name
              
              
                eugeneepshteyn 5459cff
              
                Only left IsAlternateEntry() with pointer arg
              
              
                eugeneepshteyn 15910bc
              
                Merge branch 'main' into fix-bindc-name
              
              
                eugeneepshteyn File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
          Failed to load comments.   
        
        
          
      Loading
        
  Jump to
        
          Jump to file
        
      
      
          Failed to load files.   
        
        
          
      Loading
        
  Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
              
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
              
  
    
      This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
      Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
    
  
  
    
              
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
  Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
  Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
  Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
  You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
  Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
  This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
  Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
  Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
  Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
  Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
  
    
  
    
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
It would be more clear to implement these in the opposite way, I think.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
You mean have
IsAlternateEntry(&symbol)be primary andIsAlternateEntry(*symbol)call it? I started it that way, but becauseGetMainEntry()returns a pointer, it looked somewhat less clean.There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
If you only have one call site, then you don't need both APIs (yet).
I have been slowing converting tools like this -- ones with reasonable results for absent (null) pointer arguments -- into pointer-only forms, as I run across hem.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Ok, I only left
IsAlternateEntry()that accepts the pointer, because it still looks cleaner to me.