-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 15.1k
[lld] Fix -ObjC load behavior with LTO for section names with whitespace #146654
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[lld] Fix -ObjC load behavior with LTO for section names with whitespace #146654
Conversation
|
Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project! This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be notified. If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this page. If this is not working for you, it is probably because you do not have write permissions for the repository. In which case you can instead tag reviewers by name in a comment by using If you have received no comments on your PR for a week, you can request a review by "ping"ing the PR by adding a comment “Ping”. The common courtesy "ping" rate is once a week. Please remember that you are asking for valuable time from other developers. If you have further questions, they may be answered by the LLVM GitHub User Guide. You can also ask questions in a comment on this PR, on the LLVM Discord or on the forums. |
|
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lld-macho @llvm/pr-subscribers-lld Author: None (aleksandr-urakov) ChangesThis is a fix additional to #92162 In some cases, section names contain a whitespace between the segment name and the actual section name (e.g. This fix allows LTO to work correctly with the Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/146654.diff 2 Files Affected:
diff --git a/lld/test/MachO/objc.s b/lld/test/MachO/objc.s
index dbb9f1df27571..c327b206290ab 100644
--- a/lld/test/MachO/objc.s
+++ b/lld/test/MachO/objc.s
@@ -7,12 +7,13 @@
# RUN: llvm-mc -filetype=obj -triple=x86_64-apple-darwin %t/has-swift.s -o %t/has-swift.o
# RUN: llvm-as %t/has-swift-ir-loaded.ll -o %t/has-swift-ir-loaded.o
# RUN: llvm-as %t/has-swift-ir-not-loaded.ll -o %t/has-swift-ir-not-loaded.o
+# RUN: llvm-as %t/has-swift-with-space-ir-loaded.ll -o %t/has-swift-with-space-ir-loaded.o
# RUN: llvm-mc -filetype=obj -triple=x86_64-apple-darwin %t/has-swift-proto.s -o %t/has-swift-proto.o
# RUN: llvm-mc -filetype=obj -triple=x86_64-apple-darwin %t/no-objc.s -o %t/no-objc.o
## Make sure we don't mis-parse a 32-bit file as 64-bit
# RUN: llvm-mc -filetype=obj -triple=armv7-apple-watchos %t/no-objc.s -o %t/wrong-arch.o
-# RUN: llvm-ar rcs %t/libHasSomeObjC.a %t/no-objc.o %t/has-objc-symbol.o %t/has-objc-category.o %t/has-swift.o %t/has-swift-proto.o %t/has-swift-ir-loaded.o %t/has-swift-ir-not-loaded.o %t/wrong-arch.o
-# RUN: llvm-ar rcs %t/libHasSomeObjC2.a %t/no-objc.o %t/has-objc-symbol-and-category.o %t/has-swift.o %t/has-swift-proto.o %t/has-swift-ir-loaded.o %t/has-swift-ir-not-loaded.o %t/wrong-arch.o
+# RUN: llvm-ar rcs %t/libHasSomeObjC.a %t/no-objc.o %t/has-objc-symbol.o %t/has-objc-category.o %t/has-swift.o %t/has-swift-proto.o %t/has-swift-ir-loaded.o %t/has-swift-ir-not-loaded.o %t/has-swift-with-space-ir-loaded.o %t/wrong-arch.o
+# RUN: llvm-ar rcs %t/libHasSomeObjC2.a %t/no-objc.o %t/has-objc-symbol-and-category.o %t/has-swift.o %t/has-swift-proto.o %t/has-swift-ir-loaded.o %t/has-swift-ir-not-loaded.o %t/has-swift-with-space-ir-loaded.o %t/wrong-arch.o
# RUN: llvm-mc -filetype=obj -triple=x86_64-apple-darwin %t/test.s -o %t/test.o
@@ -22,7 +23,7 @@
# RUN: %lld -lSystem %t/test.o -o %t/test -L%t -lHasSomeObjC2 -ObjC
# RUN: llvm-objdump --section-headers --syms %t/test | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=OBJC
-# RUN: %no-fatal-warnings-lld -lSystem %t/test.o -o %t/test --start-lib %t/no-objc.o %t/has-objc-symbol.o %t/has-objc-category.o %t/has-swift.o %t/has-swift-proto.o %t/has-swift-ir-loaded.o %t/has-swift-ir-not-loaded.o %t/wrong-arch.o --end-lib -ObjC 2>&1 \
+# RUN: %no-fatal-warnings-lld -lSystem %t/test.o -o %t/test --start-lib %t/no-objc.o %t/has-objc-symbol.o %t/has-objc-category.o %t/has-swift.o %t/has-swift-proto.o %t/has-swift-ir-loaded.o %t/has-swift-ir-not-loaded.o %t/has-swift-with-space-ir-loaded.o %t/wrong-arch.o --end-lib -ObjC 2>&1 \
# RUN: | FileCheck -check-prefix=WARNING %s
# RUN: llvm-objdump --section-headers --syms %t/test | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=OBJC
@@ -34,14 +35,16 @@
# OBJC-NEXT: 0 __text {{.*}} TEXT
# OBJC-NEXT: 1 __swift {{.*}} DATA
# OBJC-NEXT: 2 __swift5_fieldmd{{.*}} DATA
-# OBJC-NEXT: 3 __objc_catlist {{.*}} DATA
-# OBJC-NEXT: 4 has_objc_symbol {{.*}} DATA
+# OBJC-NEXT: 3 __swift5_proto {{.*}} DATA
+# OBJC-NEXT: 4 __objc_catlist {{.*}} DATA
+# OBJC-NEXT: 5 has_objc_symbol {{.*}} DATA
# OBJC-EMPTY:
# OBJC-NEXT: SYMBOL TABLE:
# OBJC-DAG: g O __TEXT,__swift _foo
# OBJC-DAG: g F __TEXT,__text _main
# OBJC-DAG: g F __TEXT,__text _OBJC_CLASS_$_MyObject
# OBJC-DAG: g O __TEXT,__swift5_fieldmd $s7somelib4Blah_pMF
+# OBJC-DAG: g O __TEXT,__swift5_proto _baz
# RUN: %lld -lSystem %t/test.o -o %t/test -L%t -lHasSomeObjC
# RUN: llvm-objdump --section-headers --syms %t/test | FileCheck %s --check-prefix=NO-OBJC
@@ -117,6 +120,13 @@ target triple = "x86_64-apple-darwin"
@bar = global i64 1234
@llvm.used = appending global [1 x ptr] [ptr @bar]
+#--- has-swift-with-space-ir-loaded.ll
+target datalayout = "e-m:o-i64:64-i128:128-n32:64-S128"
+target triple = "x86_64-apple-darwin"
+
+@baz = global i64 1234, section "__TEXT, __swift5_proto"
+@llvm.used = appending global [1 x ptr] [ptr @baz]
+
#--- has-swift-proto.s
.section __TEXT,__swift5_fieldmd
.globl $s7somelib4Blah_pMF
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Bitcode/Reader/BitcodeReader.cpp b/llvm/lib/Bitcode/Reader/BitcodeReader.cpp
index de7bf9b7f4d79..7cc5fb39b4169 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Bitcode/Reader/BitcodeReader.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Bitcode/Reader/BitcodeReader.cpp
@@ -296,7 +296,8 @@ static Expected<bool> hasObjCCategoryInModule(BitstreamCursor &Stream) {
// Check for the i386 and other (x86_64, ARM) conventions
if (S.find("__DATA,__objc_catlist") != std::string::npos ||
S.find("__OBJC,__category") != std::string::npos ||
- S.find("__TEXT,__swift") != std::string::npos)
+ S.find("__TEXT,__swift") != std::string::npos ||
+ S.find("__TEXT, __swift") != std::string::npos)
return true;
break;
}
|
|
Hi guys! Gentle ping |
This is a fix additional to llvm#92162 In some cases, section names contain a whitespace between the segment name and the actual section name (e.g. `__TEXT, __swift5_proto`). It is confirmed by source code of the Swift compiler This fix allows LTO to work correctly with the `-ObjC` flag in that rare case when only a section with a whitespace in the name is present in the linked bitcode module, but there are no sections containing `__TEXT,__swift`
d74d59e to
2b34df4
Compare
Co-authored-by: Ellis Hoag <ellis.sparky.hoag@gmail.com>
|
@aleksandr-urakov Congratulations on having your first Pull Request (PR) merged into the LLVM Project! Your changes will be combined with recent changes from other authors, then tested by our build bots. If there is a problem with a build, you may receive a report in an email or a comment on this PR. Please check whether problems have been caused by your change specifically, as the builds can include changes from many authors. It is not uncommon for your change to be included in a build that fails due to someone else's changes, or infrastructure issues. How to do this, and the rest of the post-merge process, is covered in detail here. If your change does cause a problem, it may be reverted, or you can revert it yourself. This is a normal part of LLVM development. You can fix your changes and open a new PR to merge them again. If you don't get any reports, no action is required from you. Your changes are working as expected, well done! |
…ace (llvm#146654) This is a fix additional to llvm#92162 In some cases, section names contain a whitespace between the segment name and the actual section name (e.g. `__TEXT, __swift5_proto`). It is confirmed by source code of the Swift compiler This fix allows LTO to work correctly with the `-ObjC` flag in that rare case when only a section with a whitespace in the name is present in the linked bitcode module, but there are no sections containing `__TEXT,__swift` --------- Co-authored-by: Ураков Александр Сергеевич <a.urakov@tbank.ru> Co-authored-by: Ellis Hoag <ellis.sparky.hoag@gmail.com>
This is a fix additional to #92162
In some cases, section names contain a whitespace between the segment name and the actual section name (e.g.
__TEXT, __swift5_proto). It is confirmed by source code of the Swift compilerThis fix allows LTO to work correctly with the
-ObjCflag in that rare case when only a section with a whitespace in the name is present in the linked bitcode module, but there are no sections containing__TEXT,__swift