Skip to content

[InstSimplify] Handle nsz when simplifying X * 0.0 #142181

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Merged

Conversation

Nadharm
Copy link
Contributor

@Nadharm Nadharm commented May 30, 2025

If ValueTracking can guarantee non-NaN and non-INF and the nsz fast-math flag is set, we can simplify X * 0.0 ==> 0.0.

https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/XacRQZ

If ValueTracking can guarantee non-NaN and non-INF and the `nsz`
fast-math flag is set, we can simplify X * 0.0 ==> 0.0.

https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/XacRQZ
@Nadharm Nadharm requested a review from nikic as a code owner May 30, 2025 16:15
Copy link

Thank you for submitting a Pull Request (PR) to the LLVM Project!

This PR will be automatically labeled and the relevant teams will be notified.

If you wish to, you can add reviewers by using the "Reviewers" section on this page.

If this is not working for you, it is probably because you do not have write permissions for the repository. In which case you can instead tag reviewers by name in a comment by using @ followed by their GitHub username.

If you have received no comments on your PR for a week, you can request a review by "ping"ing the PR by adding a comment “Ping”. The common courtesy "ping" rate is once a week. Please remember that you are asking for valuable time from other developers.

If you have further questions, they may be answered by the LLVM GitHub User Guide.

You can also ask questions in a comment on this PR, on the LLVM Discord or on the forums.

@llvmbot
Copy link
Member

llvmbot commented May 30, 2025

@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-transforms

Author: None (Nadharm)

Changes

If ValueTracking can guarantee non-NaN and non-INF and the nsz fast-math flag is set, we can simplify X * 0.0 ==> 0.0.

https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/XacRQZ


Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/142181.diff

2 Files Affected:

  • (modified) llvm/lib/Analysis/InstructionSimplify.cpp (+3)
  • (modified) llvm/test/Transforms/InstSimplify/floating-point-arithmetic.ll (+16)
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Analysis/InstructionSimplify.cpp b/llvm/lib/Analysis/InstructionSimplify.cpp
index 23e147ba8c6a1..12c84c718d4fd 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Analysis/InstructionSimplify.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Analysis/InstructionSimplify.cpp
@@ -5844,6 +5844,9 @@ static Value *simplifyFMAFMul(Value *Op0, Value *Op1, FastMathFlags FMF,
     KnownFPClass Known =
         computeKnownFPClass(Op0, FMF, fcInf | fcNan, /*Depth=*/0, Q);
     if (Known.isKnownNever(fcInf | fcNan)) {
+      // if nsz is set, return 0.0
+      if (FMF.noSignedZeros())
+        return ConstantFP::getZero(Op0->getType());
       // +normal number * (-)0.0 --> (-)0.0
       if (Known.SignBit == false)
         return Op1;
diff --git a/llvm/test/Transforms/InstSimplify/floating-point-arithmetic.ll b/llvm/test/Transforms/InstSimplify/floating-point-arithmetic.ll
index d3178a103d42c..ab4448b460bfc 100644
--- a/llvm/test/Transforms/InstSimplify/floating-point-arithmetic.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/Transforms/InstSimplify/floating-point-arithmetic.ll
@@ -211,6 +211,22 @@ define double @fmul_nnan_ninf_nneg_n0.0_commute(i127 %x) {
   ret double %r
 }
 
+define float @fmul_ninf_nnan_mul_zero_nsz(float nofpclass(inf nan) %f) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @fmul_ninf_nnan_mul_zero_nsz(
+; CHECK-NEXT:     ret float 0.000000e+00
+;
+  %r = fmul nsz float %f, 0.0
+  ret float %r
+}
+
+define float @fmul_ninf_nnan_mul_nzero_nsz(float nofpclass(inf nan) %f) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @fmul_ninf_nnan_mul_nzero_nsz(
+; CHECK-NEXT:     ret float 0.000000e+00
+;
+  %r = fmul nsz float %f, -0.0
+  ret float %r
+}
+
 define float @src_mul_nzero_neg(float nofpclass(inf nan pzero psub pnorm) %f) {
 ; CHECK-LABEL: @src_mul_nzero_neg(
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    ret float 0.000000e+00

@llvmbot
Copy link
Member

llvmbot commented May 30, 2025

@llvm/pr-subscribers-llvm-analysis

Author: None (Nadharm)

Changes

If ValueTracking can guarantee non-NaN and non-INF and the nsz fast-math flag is set, we can simplify X * 0.0 ==> 0.0.

https://alive2.llvm.org/ce/z/XacRQZ


Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/142181.diff

2 Files Affected:

  • (modified) llvm/lib/Analysis/InstructionSimplify.cpp (+3)
  • (modified) llvm/test/Transforms/InstSimplify/floating-point-arithmetic.ll (+16)
diff --git a/llvm/lib/Analysis/InstructionSimplify.cpp b/llvm/lib/Analysis/InstructionSimplify.cpp
index 23e147ba8c6a1..12c84c718d4fd 100644
--- a/llvm/lib/Analysis/InstructionSimplify.cpp
+++ b/llvm/lib/Analysis/InstructionSimplify.cpp
@@ -5844,6 +5844,9 @@ static Value *simplifyFMAFMul(Value *Op0, Value *Op1, FastMathFlags FMF,
     KnownFPClass Known =
         computeKnownFPClass(Op0, FMF, fcInf | fcNan, /*Depth=*/0, Q);
     if (Known.isKnownNever(fcInf | fcNan)) {
+      // if nsz is set, return 0.0
+      if (FMF.noSignedZeros())
+        return ConstantFP::getZero(Op0->getType());
       // +normal number * (-)0.0 --> (-)0.0
       if (Known.SignBit == false)
         return Op1;
diff --git a/llvm/test/Transforms/InstSimplify/floating-point-arithmetic.ll b/llvm/test/Transforms/InstSimplify/floating-point-arithmetic.ll
index d3178a103d42c..ab4448b460bfc 100644
--- a/llvm/test/Transforms/InstSimplify/floating-point-arithmetic.ll
+++ b/llvm/test/Transforms/InstSimplify/floating-point-arithmetic.ll
@@ -211,6 +211,22 @@ define double @fmul_nnan_ninf_nneg_n0.0_commute(i127 %x) {
   ret double %r
 }
 
+define float @fmul_ninf_nnan_mul_zero_nsz(float nofpclass(inf nan) %f) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @fmul_ninf_nnan_mul_zero_nsz(
+; CHECK-NEXT:     ret float 0.000000e+00
+;
+  %r = fmul nsz float %f, 0.0
+  ret float %r
+}
+
+define float @fmul_ninf_nnan_mul_nzero_nsz(float nofpclass(inf nan) %f) {
+; CHECK-LABEL: @fmul_ninf_nnan_mul_nzero_nsz(
+; CHECK-NEXT:     ret float 0.000000e+00
+;
+  %r = fmul nsz float %f, -0.0
+  ret float %r
+}
+
 define float @src_mul_nzero_neg(float nofpclass(inf nan pzero psub pnorm) %f) {
 ; CHECK-LABEL: @src_mul_nzero_neg(
 ; CHECK-NEXT:    ret float 0.000000e+00

@Nadharm
Copy link
Contributor Author

Nadharm commented May 30, 2025

@AlexMaclean @jholewinski

@AlexMaclean AlexMaclean requested a review from dtcxzyw May 30, 2025 21:37
Copy link
Member

@AlexMaclean AlexMaclean left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM but this is not an area I work on regularly so please wait for other reviewers more familiar with this pass to land.

Copy link
Member

@dtcxzyw dtcxzyw left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LG

@dtcxzyw dtcxzyw merged commit f71e4e9 into llvm:main May 31, 2025
15 checks passed
Copy link

@Nadharm Congratulations on having your first Pull Request (PR) merged into the LLVM Project!

Your changes will be combined with recent changes from other authors, then tested by our build bots. If there is a problem with a build, you may receive a report in an email or a comment on this PR.

Please check whether problems have been caused by your change specifically, as the builds can include changes from many authors. It is not uncommon for your change to be included in a build that fails due to someone else's changes, or infrastructure issues.

How to do this, and the rest of the post-merge process, is covered in detail here.

If your change does cause a problem, it may be reverted, or you can revert it yourself. This is a normal part of LLVM development. You can fix your changes and open a new PR to merge them again.

If you don't get any reports, no action is required from you. Your changes are working as expected, well done!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants