-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 13.6k
[libc++] Implement part of P2562R1: constexpr std::inplace_merge
#129008
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Merged
frederick-vs-ja
merged 20 commits into
llvm:main
from
frederick-vs-ja:constexpr-std-inplace_merge
Mar 18, 2025
Merged
Changes from all commits
Commits
Show all changes
20 commits
Select commit
Hold shift + click to select a range
4ae5ab2
[libc++] Implement constexpr `std::inplace_merge`
frederick-vs-ja 76b5ef4
Clang-format some test files
frederick-vs-ja cac2d2f
Merge branch 'main' into constexpr-std-inplace_merge
frederick-vs-ja 7b090e1
Change `constexpr in` to `constexpr since` in comments
frederick-vs-ja 0fd8637
Add `constexpr_random.h` for test suite
frederick-vs-ja b9cb3f5
Use constexpr-ized `minstd_rand` as random source in test files
frederick-vs-ja ed1b734
Implicitly declare destructor for `binary_counting_predicate`
frederick-vs-ja b2c8cb8
Reorder `inline` in production code
frederick-vs-ja 7d9cad8
Clang-format `constexpr_random.h`
frederick-vs-ja b547b44
Merge branch 'main' into constexpr-std-inplace_merge
frederick-vs-ja bdabdd6
Include `<limits>` in `constexpr_random.h`
frederick-vs-ja 177ec8e
Merge branch 'main' into constexpr-std-inplace_merge
frederick-vs-ja 712c95c
Fix mis-versioned `constexpr` in `constexpr_random.h`
frederick-vs-ja 49a0099
Merge branch 'main' into constexpr-std-inplace_merge
frederick-vs-ja 0c03d72
Address @mordante's review comments
frederick-vs-ja 604a5e9
Fix errors in C++03
frederick-vs-ja 3ef190d
Merge branch 'main' into constexpr-std-inplace_merge
frederick-vs-ja 5e4acac
Restore skipping
frederick-vs-ja cdc613d
Merge branch 'main' into constexpr-std-inplace_merge
frederick-vs-ja 92a413b
Address @mordante's review comments
frederick-vs-ja File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Oops, something went wrong.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
FWIW, I think I would have favoured an approach where we get rid of the randomness in these tests instead, but I think this is acceptable and certainly has benefits. No action needed.