-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14k
[lldb] Update two API tests to fix x86 Darwin failures #121380
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[lldb] Update two API tests to fix x86 Darwin failures #121380
Conversation
The Intel Darwin CI bots had their Xcode updated, which brought in a debugserver with Brendan Shanks' change from September 7281e0c llvm#108663 where four general purpose registers are sent by debugserver when in certain process states. But most processes (nearly all in the testsuite) do not have these registers available, so we will get register read failures when requesting those four. These two tests would flag those as errors. There would have been an additional problem with the g/G packet (which lldb doesn't use w/ debugserver, but the testsuite tests) if placeholder values were not included in the full register context bytes; I fixed that issue with the SME patch to debugserver recently already.
@llvm/pr-subscribers-lldb Author: Jason Molenda (jasonmolenda) ChangesThe Intel Darwin CI bots had their Xcode updated, which brought in a debugserver with Brendan Shanks' change from September 7281e0c Full diff: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/121380.diff 2 Files Affected:
diff --git a/lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/tools/lldb-server/gdbremote_testcase.py b/lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/tools/lldb-server/gdbremote_testcase.py
index d6cb68f55bf296..cbe430c92fa7fb 100644
--- a/lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/tools/lldb-server/gdbremote_testcase.py
+++ b/lldb/packages/Python/lldbsuite/test/tools/lldb-server/gdbremote_testcase.py
@@ -1410,7 +1410,17 @@ def read_register_values(self, reg_infos, endian, thread_id=None):
p_response = context.get("p_response")
self.assertIsNotNone(p_response)
self.assertTrue(len(p_response) > 0)
- self.assertFalse(p_response[0] == "E")
+
+ # on x86 Darwin, 4 GPR registers are often
+ # unavailable, this is expected and correct.
+ if (
+ self.getArchitecture() == "x86_64"
+ and self.platformIsDarwin()
+ and p_response[0] == "E"
+ ):
+ values[reg_index] = 0
+ else:
+ self.assertFalse(p_response[0] == "E")
values[reg_index] = unpack_register_hex_unsigned(endian, p_response)
diff --git a/lldb/test/API/commands/register/register/register_command/TestRegisters.py b/lldb/test/API/commands/register/register/register_command/TestRegisters.py
index 0b80a09534371e..99290e02cd2b04 100644
--- a/lldb/test/API/commands/register/register/register_command/TestRegisters.py
+++ b/lldb/test/API/commands/register/register/register_command/TestRegisters.py
@@ -58,6 +58,13 @@ def test_register_commands(self):
# could not be read. This is expected.
error_str_matched = True
+ if self.getArchitecture() == "x86_64" and self.platformIsDarwin():
+ # debugserver on x86 will provide ds/es/ss/gsbase when the
+ # kernel provides them, but most of the time they will be
+ # unavailable. So "register read -a" will report that
+ # 4 registers were unavailable, it is expected.
+ error_str_matched = True
+
self.expect(
"register read -a",
MISSING_EXPECTED_REGISTERS,
|
FTR I was looking at Brendan's PR before we merged it, and I'm sure I ran the testsuite, but I must have missed these two fails when running the testsuite with a locally-built debugserver. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Thanks!
The Intel Darwin CI bots had their Xcode updated, which brought in a debugserver with Brendan Shanks' change from September 7281e0c llvm#108663 where four general purpose registers are sent by debugserver when in certain process states. But most processes (nearly all in the testsuite) do not have these registers available, so we will get register read failures when requesting those four. These two tests would flag those as errors. There would have been an additional problem with the g/G packet (which lldb doesn't use w/ debugserver, but the testsuite tests) if placeholder values were not included in the full register context bytes; I fixed that issue with the SME patch to debugserver recently already. (cherry picked from commit 5056a4b)
…intel-debugserver [lldb] Update two API tests to fix x86 Darwin failures (llvm#121380)
The Intel Darwin CI bots had their Xcode updated, which brought in a debugserver with Brendan Shanks' change from September 7281e0c
#108663 where four general purpose registers are sent by debugserver when in certain process states. But most processes (nearly all in the testsuite) do not have these registers available, so we will get register read failures when requesting those four. These two tests would flag those as errors. There would have been an additional problem with the g/G packet (which lldb doesn't use w/ debugserver, but the testsuite tests) if placeholder values were not included in the full register context bytes; I fixed that issue with the SME patch to debugserver recently already.