release/19.x: Reland [C++20] [Modules] [Itanium ABI] Generate the vtable in the mod… (#102287) #102561
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@mizvekov What do you think about merging this PR to the release branch? |
llvmbot
added
clang
|
@llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-codegen @llvm/pr-subscribers-clang-modules Author: None (llvmbot) ChangesBackport 847f9cb Requested by: @ChuanqiXu9 Patch is 27.70 KiB, truncated to 20.00 KiB below, full version: https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/pull/102561.diff 19 Files Affected:
diff --git a/clang/include/clang/AST/DeclBase.h b/clang/include/clang/AST/DeclBase.h
index 40f01abf384e92..2a4bd0f9c2fda3 100644
--- a/clang/include/clang/AST/DeclBase.h
+++ b/clang/include/clang/AST/DeclBase.h
@@ -670,6 +670,13 @@ class alignas(8) Decl {
/// Whether this declaration comes from another module unit.
bool isInAnotherModuleUnit() const;
+ /// Whether this declaration comes from the same module unit being compiled.
+ bool isInCurrentModuleUnit() const;
+
+ /// Whether the definition of the declaration should be emitted in external
+ /// sources.
+ bool shouldEmitInExternalSource() const;
+
/// Whether this declaration comes from explicit global module.
bool isFromExplicitGlobalModule() const;
diff --git a/clang/include/clang/Serialization/ASTBitCodes.h b/clang/include/clang/Serialization/ASTBitCodes.h
index 5dd0ba33f8a9c2..9b7e3af0e449b5 100644
--- a/clang/include/clang/Serialization/ASTBitCodes.h
+++ b/clang/include/clang/Serialization/ASTBitCodes.h
@@ -721,6 +721,9 @@ enum ASTRecordTypes {
/// Record code for \#pragma clang unsafe_buffer_usage begin/end
PP_UNSAFE_BUFFER_USAGE = 69,
+
+ /// Record code for vtables to emit.
+ VTABLES_TO_EMIT = 70,
};
/// Record types used within a source manager block.
diff --git a/clang/include/clang/Serialization/ASTReader.h b/clang/include/clang/Serialization/ASTReader.h
index 76e51ac7ab9792..671520a3602b3b 100644
--- a/clang/include/clang/Serialization/ASTReader.h
+++ b/clang/include/clang/Serialization/ASTReader.h
@@ -790,6 +790,11 @@ class ASTReader
/// the consumer eagerly.
SmallVector<GlobalDeclID, 16> EagerlyDeserializedDecls;
+ /// The IDs of all vtables to emit. The referenced declarations are passed
+ /// to the consumers' HandleVTable eagerly after passing
+ /// EagerlyDeserializedDecls.
+ SmallVector<GlobalDeclID, 16> VTablesToEmit;
+
/// The IDs of all tentative definitions stored in the chain.
///
/// Sema keeps track of all tentative definitions in a TU because it has to
@@ -1500,6 +1505,7 @@ class ASTReader
bool isConsumerInterestedIn(Decl *D);
void PassInterestingDeclsToConsumer();
void PassInterestingDeclToConsumer(Decl *D);
+ void PassVTableToConsumer(CXXRecordDecl *RD);
void finishPendingActions();
void diagnoseOdrViolations();
diff --git a/clang/include/clang/Serialization/ASTWriter.h b/clang/include/clang/Serialization/ASTWriter.h
index a0e475ec9f862c..71a7c28047e318 100644
--- a/clang/include/clang/Serialization/ASTWriter.h
+++ b/clang/include/clang/Serialization/ASTWriter.h
@@ -500,6 +500,10 @@ class ASTWriter : public ASTDeserializationListener,
std::vector<SourceRange> NonAffectingRanges;
std::vector<SourceLocation::UIntTy> NonAffectingOffsetAdjustments;
+ /// A list of classes which need to emit the VTable in the corresponding
+ /// object file.
+ llvm::SmallVector<CXXRecordDecl *> PendingEmittingVTables;
+
/// Computes input files that didn't affect compilation of the current module,
/// and initializes data structures necessary for leaving those files out
/// during \c SourceManager serialization.
@@ -857,6 +861,8 @@ class ASTWriter : public ASTDeserializationListener,
return PredefinedDecls.count(D);
}
+ void handleVTable(CXXRecordDecl *RD);
+
private:
// ASTDeserializationListener implementation
void ReaderInitialized(ASTReader *Reader) override;
@@ -951,6 +957,7 @@ class PCHGenerator : public SemaConsumer {
void InitializeSema(Sema &S) override { SemaPtr = &S; }
void HandleTranslationUnit(ASTContext &Ctx) override;
+ void HandleVTable(CXXRecordDecl *RD) override { Writer.handleVTable(RD); }
ASTMutationListener *GetASTMutationListener() override;
ASTDeserializationListener *GetASTDeserializationListener() override;
bool hasEmittedPCH() const { return Buffer->IsComplete; }
diff --git a/clang/lib/AST/ASTContext.cpp b/clang/lib/AST/ASTContext.cpp
index 7af9ea7105bb08..3da5e888f25175 100644
--- a/clang/lib/AST/ASTContext.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/AST/ASTContext.cpp
@@ -12405,8 +12405,7 @@ bool ASTContext::DeclMustBeEmitted(const Decl *D) {
!isMSStaticDataMemberInlineDefinition(VD))
return false;
- // Variables in other module units shouldn't be forced to be emitted.
- if (VD->isInAnotherModuleUnit())
+ if (VD->shouldEmitInExternalSource())
return false;
// Variables that can be needed in other TUs are required.
diff --git a/clang/lib/AST/DeclBase.cpp b/clang/lib/AST/DeclBase.cpp
index bc5a9206c0db28..b59f118380ca4b 100644
--- a/clang/lib/AST/DeclBase.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/AST/DeclBase.cpp
@@ -1125,20 +1125,36 @@ bool Decl::isInAnotherModuleUnit() const {
if (!M)
return false;
+ // FIXME or NOTE: maybe we need to be clear about the semantics
+ // of clang header modules. e.g., if this lives in a clang header
+ // module included by the current unit, should we return false
+ // here?
+ //
+ // This is clear for header units as the specification says the
+ // header units live in a synthesised translation unit. So we
+ // can return false here.
M = M->getTopLevelModule();
- // FIXME: It is problematic if the header module lives in another module
- // unit. Consider to fix this by techniques like
- // ExternalASTSource::hasExternalDefinitions.
- if (M->isHeaderLikeModule())
+ if (!M->isNamedModule())
return false;
- // A global module without parent implies that we're parsing the global
- // module. So it can't be in another module unit.
- if (M->isGlobalModule())
+ return M != getASTContext().getCurrentNamedModule();
+}
+
+bool Decl::isInCurrentModuleUnit() const {
+ auto *M = getOwningModule();
+
+ if (!M || !M->isNamedModule())
return false;
- assert(M->isNamedModule() && "New module kind?");
- return M != getASTContext().getCurrentNamedModule();
+ return M == getASTContext().getCurrentNamedModule();
+}
+
+bool Decl::shouldEmitInExternalSource() const {
+ ExternalASTSource *Source = getASTContext().getExternalSource();
+ if (!Source)
+ return false;
+
+ return Source->hasExternalDefinitions(this) == ExternalASTSource::EK_Always;
}
bool Decl::isFromExplicitGlobalModule() const {
diff --git a/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGVTables.cpp b/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGVTables.cpp
index 7f729d359b82b3..267bdf09829700 100644
--- a/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGVTables.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/CodeGen/CGVTables.cpp
@@ -1078,29 +1078,41 @@ llvm::GlobalVariable::LinkageTypes
CodeGenModule::getVTableLinkage(const CXXRecordDecl *RD) {
if (!RD->isExternallyVisible())
return llvm::GlobalVariable::InternalLinkage;
-
- // We're at the end of the translation unit, so the current key
- // function is fully correct.
- const CXXMethodDecl *keyFunction = Context.getCurrentKeyFunction(RD);
- if (keyFunction && !RD->hasAttr<DLLImportAttr>()) {
+
+ // In windows, the linkage of vtable is not related to modules.
+ bool IsInNamedModule = !getTarget().getCXXABI().isMicrosoft() &&
+ RD->isInNamedModule();
+ // If the CXXRecordDecl is not in a module unit, we need to get
+ // its key function. We're at the end of the translation unit, so the current
+ // key function is fully correct.
+ const CXXMethodDecl *keyFunction =
+ IsInNamedModule ? nullptr : Context.getCurrentKeyFunction(RD);
+ if (IsInNamedModule || (keyFunction && !RD->hasAttr<DLLImportAttr>())) {
// If this class has a key function, use that to determine the
// linkage of the vtable.
const FunctionDecl *def = nullptr;
- if (keyFunction->hasBody(def))
+ if (keyFunction && keyFunction->hasBody(def))
keyFunction = cast<CXXMethodDecl>(def);
- switch (keyFunction->getTemplateSpecializationKind()) {
- case TSK_Undeclared:
- case TSK_ExplicitSpecialization:
+ bool IsExternalDefinition =
+ IsInNamedModule ? RD->shouldEmitInExternalSource() : !def;
+
+ TemplateSpecializationKind Kind =
+ IsInNamedModule ? RD->getTemplateSpecializationKind()
+ : keyFunction->getTemplateSpecializationKind();
+
+ switch (Kind) {
+ case TSK_Undeclared:
+ case TSK_ExplicitSpecialization:
assert(
- (def || CodeGenOpts.OptimizationLevel > 0 ||
+ (IsInNamedModule || def || CodeGenOpts.OptimizationLevel > 0 ||
CodeGenOpts.getDebugInfo() != llvm::codegenoptions::NoDebugInfo) &&
- "Shouldn't query vtable linkage without key function, "
- "optimizations, or debug info");
- if (!def && CodeGenOpts.OptimizationLevel > 0)
+ "Shouldn't query vtable linkage without the class in module units, "
+ "key function, optimizations, or debug info");
+ if (IsExternalDefinition && CodeGenOpts.OptimizationLevel > 0)
return llvm::GlobalVariable::AvailableExternallyLinkage;
- if (keyFunction->isInlined())
+ if (keyFunction && keyFunction->isInlined())
return !Context.getLangOpts().AppleKext
? llvm::GlobalVariable::LinkOnceODRLinkage
: llvm::Function::InternalLinkage;
@@ -1119,7 +1131,7 @@ CodeGenModule::getVTableLinkage(const CXXRecordDecl *RD) {
case TSK_ExplicitInstantiationDeclaration:
llvm_unreachable("Should not have been asked to emit this");
- }
+ }
}
// -fapple-kext mode does not support weak linkage, so we must use
@@ -1213,22 +1225,20 @@ bool CodeGenVTables::isVTableExternal(const CXXRecordDecl *RD) {
TSK == TSK_ExplicitInstantiationDefinition)
return false;
+ // Otherwise, if the class is attached to a module, the tables are uniquely
+ // emitted in the object for the module unit in which it is defined.
+ if (RD->isInNamedModule())
+ return RD->shouldEmitInExternalSource();
+
// Otherwise, if the class doesn't have a key function (possibly
// anymore), the vtable must be defined here.
const CXXMethodDecl *keyFunction = CGM.getContext().getCurrentKeyFunction(RD);
if (!keyFunction)
return false;
- const FunctionDecl *Def;
// Otherwise, if we don't have a definition of the key function, the
// vtable must be defined somewhere else.
- if (!keyFunction->hasBody(Def))
- return true;
-
- assert(Def && "The body of the key function is not assigned to Def?");
- // If the non-inline key function comes from another module unit, the vtable
- // must be defined there.
- return Def->isInAnotherModuleUnit() && !Def->isInlineSpecified();
+ return !keyFunction->hasBody();
}
/// Given that we're currently at the end of the translation unit, and
diff --git a/clang/lib/CodeGen/ItaniumCXXABI.cpp b/clang/lib/CodeGen/ItaniumCXXABI.cpp
index cd76f8406e7b72..0be92fb2e27579 100644
--- a/clang/lib/CodeGen/ItaniumCXXABI.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/CodeGen/ItaniumCXXABI.cpp
@@ -2315,6 +2315,9 @@ bool ItaniumCXXABI::canSpeculativelyEmitVTable(const CXXRecordDecl *RD) const {
if (!canSpeculativelyEmitVTableAsBaseClass(RD))
return false;
+ if (RD->shouldEmitInExternalSource())
+ return false;
+
// For a complete-object vtable (or more specifically, for the VTT), we need
// to be able to speculatively emit the vtables of all dynamic virtual bases.
for (const auto &B : RD->vbases()) {
diff --git a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp
index 01231f8e385ef1..99ee8efea54c03 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDecl.cpp
@@ -18073,6 +18073,15 @@ void Sema::ActOnTagFinishDefinition(Scope *S, Decl *TagD,
if (NumInitMethods > 1 || !Def->hasInitMethod())
Diag(RD->getLocation(), diag::err_sycl_special_type_num_init_method);
}
+
+ // If we're defining a dynamic class in a module interface unit, we always
+ // need to produce the vtable for it, even if the vtable is not used in the
+ // current TU.
+ //
+ // The case where the current class is not dynamic is handled in
+ // MarkVTableUsed.
+ if (getCurrentModule() && getCurrentModule()->isInterfaceOrPartition())
+ MarkVTableUsed(RD->getLocation(), RD, /*DefinitionRequired=*/true);
}
// Exit this scope of this tag's definition.
diff --git a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp
index 04b8d88cae217b..6f058a62599991 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Sema/SemaDeclCXX.cpp
@@ -18485,11 +18485,15 @@ bool Sema::DefineUsedVTables() {
bool DefineVTable = true;
- // If this class has a key function, but that key function is
- // defined in another translation unit, we don't need to emit the
- // vtable even though we're using it.
const CXXMethodDecl *KeyFunction = Context.getCurrentKeyFunction(Class);
- if (KeyFunction && !KeyFunction->hasBody()) {
+ // V-tables for non-template classes with an owning module are always
+ // uniquely emitted in that module.
+ if (Class->isInCurrentModuleUnit()) {
+ DefineVTable = true;
+ } else if (KeyFunction && !KeyFunction->hasBody()) {
+ // If this class has a key function, but that key function is
+ // defined in another translation unit, we don't need to emit the
+ // vtable even though we're using it.
// The key function is in another translation unit.
DefineVTable = false;
TemplateSpecializationKind TSK =
@@ -18534,7 +18538,7 @@ bool Sema::DefineUsedVTables() {
DefinedAnything = true;
MarkVirtualMembersReferenced(Loc, Class);
CXXRecordDecl *Canonical = Class->getCanonicalDecl();
- if (VTablesUsed[Canonical])
+ if (VTablesUsed[Canonical] && !Class->shouldEmitInExternalSource())
Consumer.HandleVTable(Class);
// Warn if we're emitting a weak vtable. The vtable will be weak if there is
diff --git a/clang/lib/Serialization/ASTReader.cpp b/clang/lib/Serialization/ASTReader.cpp
index 3cb96df12e4da0..29aec144aec1a8 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Serialization/ASTReader.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Serialization/ASTReader.cpp
@@ -3921,6 +3921,13 @@ llvm::Error ASTReader::ReadASTBlock(ModuleFile &F,
}
break;
+ case VTABLES_TO_EMIT:
+ if (F.Kind == MK_MainFile ||
+ getContext().getLangOpts().BuildingPCHWithObjectFile)
+ for (unsigned I = 0, N = Record.size(); I != N;)
+ VTablesToEmit.push_back(ReadDeclID(F, Record, I));
+ break;
+
case IMPORTED_MODULES:
if (!F.isModule()) {
// If we aren't loading a module (which has its own exports), make
@@ -8110,6 +8117,10 @@ void ASTReader::PassInterestingDeclToConsumer(Decl *D) {
Consumer->HandleInterestingDecl(DeclGroupRef(D));
}
+void ASTReader::PassVTableToConsumer(CXXRecordDecl *RD) {
+ Consumer->HandleVTable(RD);
+}
+
void ASTReader::StartTranslationUnit(ASTConsumer *Consumer) {
this->Consumer = Consumer;
diff --git a/clang/lib/Serialization/ASTReaderDecl.cpp b/clang/lib/Serialization/ASTReaderDecl.cpp
index 31ab6c651d59f4..f17069fe12e3bb 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Serialization/ASTReaderDecl.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Serialization/ASTReaderDecl.cpp
@@ -4209,6 +4209,13 @@ void ASTReader::PassInterestingDeclsToConsumer() {
// If we add any new potential interesting decl in the last call, consume it.
ConsumingPotentialInterestingDecls();
+
+ for (GlobalDeclID ID : VTablesToEmit) {
+ auto *RD = cast<CXXRecordDecl>(GetDecl(ID));
+ assert(!RD->shouldEmitInExternalSource());
+ PassVTableToConsumer(RD);
+ }
+ VTablesToEmit.clear();
}
void ASTReader::loadDeclUpdateRecords(PendingUpdateRecord &Record) {
diff --git a/clang/lib/Serialization/ASTWriter.cpp b/clang/lib/Serialization/ASTWriter.cpp
index c78d8943d6d92e..7c0636962459e9 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Serialization/ASTWriter.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Serialization/ASTWriter.cpp
@@ -927,6 +927,7 @@ void ASTWriter::WriteBlockInfoBlock() {
RECORD(DECLS_TO_CHECK_FOR_DEFERRED_DIAGS);
RECORD(PP_ASSUME_NONNULL_LOC);
RECORD(PP_UNSAFE_BUFFER_USAGE);
+ RECORD(VTABLES_TO_EMIT);
// SourceManager Block.
BLOCK(SOURCE_MANAGER_BLOCK);
@@ -3961,6 +3962,10 @@ void ASTWriter::WriteIdentifierTable(Preprocessor &PP,
Stream.EmitRecord(INTERESTING_IDENTIFIERS, InterestingIdents);
}
+void ASTWriter::handleVTable(CXXRecordDecl *RD) {
+ PendingEmittingVTables.push_back(RD);
+}
+
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
// DeclContext's Name Lookup Table Serialization
//===----------------------------------------------------------------------===//
@@ -5163,6 +5168,13 @@ void ASTWriter::PrepareWritingSpecialDecls(Sema &SemaRef) {
// Write all of the DeclsToCheckForDeferredDiags.
for (auto *D : SemaRef.DeclsToCheckForDeferredDiags)
GetDeclRef(D);
+
+ // Write all classes that need to emit the vtable definitions if required.
+ if (isWritingStdCXXNamedModules())
+ for (CXXRecordDecl *RD : PendingEmittingVTables)
+ GetDeclRef(RD);
+ else
+ PendingEmittingVTables.clear();
}
void ASTWriter::WriteSpecialDeclRecords(Sema &SemaRef) {
@@ -5317,6 +5329,17 @@ void ASTWriter::WriteSpecialDeclRecords(Sema &SemaRef) {
}
if (!DeleteExprsToAnalyze.empty())
Stream.EmitRecord(DELETE_EXPRS_TO_ANALYZE, DeleteExprsToAnalyze);
+
+ RecordData VTablesToEmit;
+ for (CXXRecordDecl *RD : PendingEmittingVTables) {
+ if (!wasDeclEmitted(RD))
+ continue;
+
+ AddDeclRef(RD, VTablesToEmit);
+ }
+
+ if (!VTablesToEmit.empty())
+ Stream.EmitRecord(VTABLES_TO_EMIT, VTablesToEmit);
}
ASTFileSignature ASTWriter::WriteASTCore(Sema &SemaRef, StringRef isysroot,
@@ -6559,10 +6582,12 @@ void ASTRecordWriter::AddCXXDefinitionData(const CXXRecordDecl *D) {
// computed.
Record->push_back(D->getODRHash());
- bool ModulesDebugInfo =
- Writer->Context->getLangOpts().ModulesDebugInfo && !D->isDependentType();
- Record->push_back(ModulesDebugInfo);
- if (ModulesDebugInfo)
+ bool ModulesCodegen =
+ !D->isDependentType() &&
+ (Writer->Context->getLangOpts().ModulesDebugInfo ||
+ D->isInNamedModule());
+ Record->push_back(ModulesCodegen);
+ if (ModulesCodegen)
Writer->AddDeclRef(D, Writer->ModularCodegenDecls);
// IsLambda bit is already saved.
diff --git a/clang/lib/Serialization/ASTWriterDecl.cpp b/clang/lib/Serialization/ASTWriterDecl.cpp
index 17c774038571ef..8a4ca54349e38f 100644
--- a/clang/lib/Serialization/ASTWriterDecl.cpp
+++ b/clang/lib/Serialization/ASTWriterDecl.cpp
@@ -1529,8 +1529,14 @@ void ASTDeclWriter::VisitCXXRecordDecl(CXXRecordDecl *D) {
if (D->isThisDeclarationADefinition())
Record.AddCXXDefinitionData(D);
+ if (D->isCompleteDefinition() && D->isInNamedModule())
+ Writer.AddDeclRef(D, Writer.ModularCodegenDecls);
+
// Store (what we currently believe to be) the key function to avoid
// deserializing every method so we can compute it.
+ //
+ // FIXME: Avoid adding the key function if the class is defined in
+ // module purview since in that case the key function is meaningless.
if (D->isCompleteDefinition())
Record.AddDeclRef(Context.getCurrentKeyFunction(D));
diff --git a/clang/test/CodeGenCXX/modules-vtable.cppm b/clang/test/CodeGenCXX/modules-vtable.cppm
index fb179b1de4880b..5cc3504d72628f 100644
--- a/clang/test/CodeGenCXX/modules-vtable.cppm
+++ b/clang/test/CodeGenCXX/modules-vtable.cppm
@@ -24,6 +24,8 @@
// RUN: %t/M-A.cppm -o %t/M-A.pcm
// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple %itanium_abi_triple -std=c++20 -fmodule-file=M:A=%t/M-A.pcm \
// RUN: %t/M-B.cppm -emit-llvm -o - | FileCheck %t/M-B.cppm
+// RUN: %clang_cc1 -triple %itanium_abi_triple -std=c++20 \
+// RUN: %t/M-A.pcm -emit-llvm -o - | FileCheck %t/M-A.cppm
//--- Mod.cppm
export module Mod;
@@ -41,9 +43,10 @@ Base::~Base() {}
// CHECK: @_ZTSW3Mod4Base = constant
// CHECK: @_ZTIW3Mod4Base = constant
-// CHECK-INLINE: @_ZTVW3Mod4Base = linkonce_odr {{.*}}unnamed_addr constant
-// CHECK-INLINE: @_ZTSW3Mod4Base = linkonce_odr {{.*}}constant
-// CHECK-INLINE: @_ZTIW3Mod4Base = linkonce_odr {{.*}}constant
+// With the new Itanium C++ ABI, the linkage of vtables in modules don't need to be linkonce ODR.
+// CHECK-INLINE: @_ZTVW3Mod4Base = {{.*}}unnamed_addr constant
+// CHECK-INLINE: @_ZTSW3Mod4Base = {{.*}}constant
+// CHECK-INLINE: @_ZTIW3Mod4Base = {{.*}}constant
module :private;
int private_use() {
@@ -58,13 +61,13 @@ int use() {
return 43;
}
-// CHECK-NOT: @_ZTSW3Mod4Base = constant
-// CHECK-NOT: @_ZTIW3Mod4Base = constant
-// CHECK: @_ZTVW3Mod4Base = external unnamed_addr
+// CHECK-NOT: @_ZTSW3Mod4Base
+// CHECK-NOT: @_ZTIW3Mod4Base
+// CHECK: @_ZTVW3Mod4Base = external
-// CHECK...
[truncated]
|
|
@ChuanqiXu9 are we good to merge this? It seems like a pretty big patch but reading the description it seems like some good fixes in there. Any risk taking this on? |
Yes, this is not small. And I am not 100% sure it is fine. But given this is important, I still like to backport this. How about waiting 2 weeks to see if there is any regression reports? If no, I'll try to ping you again to merge this. |
|
That seems fine. We should have another 3 weeks before the final is released, so if you have higher confidence before that we can merge. |
That seems counter-intuitive. Yes there are projects using LLVM main, but it would appear much more likely to me to get regression reports from the release candidates? |
Yeah, but we may need to find a balance point otherwise we should backport all patches since that will make things get better tested but it might introduce worse user experience. And the balance point is not well defined and generally being introduced by feelings. Given my feelings for the issue reports of modules, I do feel a lot of them are using main branch. |
|
Any update on this one? |
No regression reports received. I think we can backport this. |
llvm#102287) Reland llvm#75912 The differences of this PR between llvm#75912 are: - Fixed a regression in `Decl::isInAnotherModuleUnit()` in DeclBase.cpp pointed by @mizvekov and add the corresponding test. - Fixed the regression in windows llvm#97447. The changes are in `CodeGenModule::getVTableLinkage` from `clang/lib/CodeGen/CGVTables.cpp`. According to the feedbacks from MSVC devs, the linkage of vtables won't affected by modules. So I simply skipped the case for MSVC. Given this is more or less fundamental to the use of modules. I hope we can backport this to 19.x. (cherry picked from commit 847f9cb)
|
@ChuanqiXu9 (or anyone else). If you would like to add a note about this fix in the release notes (completely optional). Please reply to this comment with a one or two sentence description of the fix. When you are done, please add the release:note label to this PR. |
ChuanqiXu9
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 22, 2024
…105610) This landed as #102287 for main & #102561 for 19.x CC @ChuanqiXu9
cjdb
pushed a commit
to cjdb/llvm-project
that referenced
this pull request
Aug 23, 2024
…lvm#105610) This landed as llvm#102287 for main & llvm#102561 for 19.x CC @ChuanqiXu9
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Backport 847f9cb
Requested by: @ChuanqiXu9