use redux for "state"

[stephenmathieson]

we'd win a bunch of stuff by moving to redux:

• easier onboarding for newcomers (everyone already knows redux, and if they don't there's a ton of documentation)
• better developer experience provided by ridiculously awesome tools like redux-devtools-extension
• hugely simplified codebase
• much simpler automated testing
• access to tons of plugins: https://www.npmjs.com/search?q=redux

[jwerle]

I'm in full support of this !

[stephenmathieson]

may be tricky, since we've got things other than regular objects in state :/

i'll hack on this a bit though, hopefully come up with something

[jwerle]

Its a good thing those objects can be deleted from the state object though

On Mon, Aug 15, 2016 at 1:17 PM, Stephen Mathieson <notifications@github.com

wrote:

may be tricky, since we've got things other than regular objects in state
https://github.com/littlstar/axis/blob/master/state.js#L455-L458 :/

i'll hack on this a bit though, hopefully come up with something

—
You are receiving this because you commented.
Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub
#97 (comment), or mute
the thread
https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABZSvZR6fDb0HRwVQYaojn5AZW-nCf9tks5qgJ80gaJpZM4Jjyo7
.

## Joseph Werle
CTO - Littlstar
littlstar.com/werle https://littlstar.com/werle

// Download Littlstar on iOS https://itunes.apple.com/app/id964433932 and
Android
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.littlstar.android&hl=en
//

[image: Inline image 1]

[stephenmathieson]

hahahahaa k