feat: unify DTK5 and DTK6

[asterwyx]

Build DTK5 and DTK6 packages from dtkcore.

Log: unify DTK5 and DTK6
Influence: None

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

This PR unifies the build system to support building both DTK5 (Qt5-based) and DTK6 (Qt6-based) packages from a single dtkcore source repository. The key change introduces a DTK5 CMake option that controls which version to build, replacing the previous approach of determining the version from the PROJECT_VERSION_MAJOR.

Key changes:

• Introduced DTK5 CMake option and DTK_NAME_SUFFIX variable to control version-specific naming
• Refactored conditional compilation from checking DTK_VERSION_MAJOR to checking DTK5 boolean
• Updated debian packaging to build both DTK5 and DTK6 packages with separate build directories

Reviewed changes

Copilot reviewed 32 out of 32 changed files in this pull request and generated 8 comments.

Show a summary per file

File	Description
CMakeLists.txt	Introduces DTK5 option and switches from version-based to option-based configuration
dtkcore.cmake	Updates library names, paths, and CMake config generation to use DTK_NAME_SUFFIX
debian/rules	Implements dual-build strategy for DTK5 and DTK6 with separate build directories
debian/control	Adds DTK6 package definitions and updates DTK5 package descriptions
debian/*.install	Specifies version-specific installation paths to avoid conflicts
src/CMakeLists.txt	Updates library version properties and dependency references to use new variables
src/util/util.cmake	Changes conditional from DTK_VERSION_MAJOR to DTK5 check
src/settings/settings.cmake	Changes conditional from DTK_VERSION_MAJOR to DTK5 check
src/glob.cmake	Changes conditional from DTK_VERSION_MAJOR to DTK5 check
tests/CMakeLists.txt	Updates test exclusion logic to use DTK5 check
tools/*/CMakeLists.txt	Updates binary naming and export targets to use DTK_NAME_SUFFIX
misc/*.in	Updates template files to use new DTK version and suffix variables
cmake/*/CMakeConfig.cmake.in	Updates CMake config files to reference correct versioned dependencies
examples/*/CMakeLists.txt	Updates example binary names to use DTK_NAME_SUFFIX
docs/CMakeLists.txt	Updates documentation version to use DTK_VERSION
archlinux/PKGBUILD	Adds DTK5=ON flag for Arch Linux builds

---

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

[Copilot]

Pull request overview

Copilot reviewed 32 out of 32 changed files in this pull request and generated 4 comments.

---

💡 Add Copilot custom instructions for smarter, more guided reviews. Learn how to get started.

[deepin-ci-robot]

deepin pr auto review

我来对这个git diff进行审查。这是一个较大的改动，主要涉及DTK5和DTK6版本支持的变更。

1. 语法逻辑：

• 代码逻辑基本正确，版本控制逻辑清晰
• CMakeLists.txt中的版本判断逻辑从基于PROJECT_VERSION_MAJOR改为使用DTK5选项，这样更直观
• debian/rules中的构建逻辑正确分离了DTK5和DTK6的构建过程

2. 代码质量：

• 变量命名规范统一，如DTK5、DTK6、DTK_NAME_SUFFIX等
• 文件组织结构清晰，将DTK5和DTK6相关文件分开
• 注释充分，特别是在版本处理的关键部分

3. 代码性能：

• 没有明显的性能问题
• 构建过程合理分离，避免了不必要的重复构建

4. 代码安全：

• 文件路径处理使用了CMAKE_CURRENT_SOURCE_DIR等标准变量，安全性较好
• 版本号处理使用了正则表达式和字符串操作，处理得当

改进建议：

1. CMakeLists.txt中：

# 建议添加版本检查
if(NOT DEFINED DTK5)
    option(DTK5 "Build DTK5." ON)
endif()

2. debian/rules中：

# 建议添加错误检查
ifeq ($(BUILD_DTK5)$(BUILD_DTK6), OFFOFF)
    $(error At least one of DTK5 or DTK6 must be built)
endif

3. 建议在关键配置变更处添加更多注释，特别是在版本切换的部分

4. 建议添加版本兼容性检查：

if(DTK5 AND QT_VERSION_MAJOR VERSION_GREATER 5)
    message(FATAL_ERROR "DTK5 requires Qt5")
endif()
if(NOT DTK5 AND QT_VERSION_MAJOR VERSION_LESS 6)
    message(FATAL_ERROR "DTK6 requires Qt6")
endif()

5. 建议在配置文件中添加版本说明：

message(STATUS "Building DTK${DTK_VERSION_MAJOR} with Qt${QT_VERSION_MAJOR}")

总的来说，这个改动是合理的，实现了DTK5和DTK6的并行支持，代码质量良好。只需要添加一些额外的错误检查和注释来提高可维护性。

[deepin-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: asterwyx, felixonmars, zccrs

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• debian/deepin/OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment