Skip to content

ci: Add tft plan and workflow#209

Merged
richm merged 1 commit intomainfrom
ci-testingfarm-tests
Jul 24, 2024
Merged

ci: Add tft plan and workflow#209
richm merged 1 commit intomainfrom
ci-testingfarm-tests

Conversation

@spetrosi
Copy link
Collaborator

This change is for running tests in Testing Farm CI. This is a replacement for
BaseOS CI that we are currently using. Running it Testing Farm gives us more
control.

It adds a workflow for running tests, and a plans directory containing a test
plan and a README-plans.md with some info.

Note that this workflow runs from the main branch. This means that changes to
the workflow must be merged to main, then pull requests will be able to run it.
This is because the workflow uses on: issue_comment context, this is a security
measure recommended by GitHub. It saves us from leaking organization secrets.

The functionality is WIP, so await future fixes and updates.

Signed-off-by: Sergei Petrosian spetrosi@redhat.com

This change is for running tests in Testing Farm CI. This is a replacement for
BaseOS CI that we are currently using. Running it Testing Farm gives us more
control.

It adds a workflow for running tests, and a plans directory containing a test
plan and a README-plans.md with some info.

Note that this workflow runs from the main branch. This means that changes to
the workflow must be merged to main, then pull requests will be able to run it.
This is because the workflow uses on: issue_comment context, this is a security
measure recommended by GitHub. It saves us from leaking organization secrets.

The functionality is WIP, so await future fixes and updates.

Signed-off-by: Sergei Petrosian <spetrosi@redhat.com>
@richm richm merged commit ab3cc8d into main Jul 24, 2024
@richm richm deleted the ci-testingfarm-tests branch July 24, 2024 16:15
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants