LCORE-1070: better comments in integration tests#955
Conversation
WalkthroughDocumentation-only updates across four integration test files: docstrings were standardized by replacing "Args:" with "Parameters:", adding explicit type annotations/descriptions, and introducing "Returns:" or "Yields:" sections where applicable. No runtime or API changes. Changes
Estimated code review effort🎯 2 (Simple) | ⏱️ ~10 minutes Possibly related PRs
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches✅ Passed checks (3 passed)
✨ Finishing touches
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (4)
tests/integration/endpoints/test_config_integration.py (1)
50-53: Standardize the Parameters section format.The Parameters section formatting is inconsistent within this file. Lines 26-28 and 73-74 include explicit type annotations in parentheses (e.g.,
test_config (AppConfig):), while lines 51-53 omit them. For consistency and clarity, please use the same format throughout the file.🔎 Suggested format
Parameters: - current_config: Loads root configuration - test_request: FastAPI request - test_auth: noop authentication tuple + current_config (AppConfig): Loads root configuration + test_request (Request): FastAPI request + test_auth (AuthTuple): noop authentication tupletests/integration/endpoints/test_query_v2_integration.py (1)
155-160: Incomplete docstring standardization creates inconsistency.This file contains a mix of "Args:" (lines 155-160, 290-295, 344-350, 410-416, 474-480, and many others) and "Parameters:" (lines 200-208, 247-254, 545-554, etc.) sections. Since the PR objective is to improve documentation consistency, consider updating all docstrings to use the same format throughout the file.
tests/integration/endpoints/test_health_integration.py (1)
86-89: Inconsistent docstring style within the file.Similar to other files in this PR, this file mixes "Args:" (lines 86-89, 140-142) with "Parameters:" (lines 57-62, 167-173) sections. For documentation consistency, consider updating all docstrings to use the same format.
tests/integration/endpoints/test_info_integration.py (1)
99-105: Inconsistent docstring style within the file.This file contains both "Args:" (lines 99-105, 138-143) and "Parameters:" (lines 26-30, 61-68) sections. To maintain consistency across the file, consider updating all docstrings to use the same format.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
tests/integration/endpoints/test_config_integration.pytests/integration/endpoints/test_health_integration.pytests/integration/endpoints/test_info_integration.pytests/integration/endpoints/test_query_v2_integration.py
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
tests/{unit,integration}/**/*.py
📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)
tests/{unit,integration}/**/*.py: Use pytest for all unit and integration tests; do not use unittest framework
Unit tests must achieve 60% code coverage; integration tests must achieve 10% coverage
Files:
tests/integration/endpoints/test_config_integration.pytests/integration/endpoints/test_info_integration.pytests/integration/endpoints/test_query_v2_integration.pytests/integration/endpoints/test_health_integration.py
tests/**/*.py
📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)
Use
pytest-mockwith AsyncMock objects for mocking in tests
Files:
tests/integration/endpoints/test_config_integration.pytests/integration/endpoints/test_info_integration.pytests/integration/endpoints/test_query_v2_integration.pytests/integration/endpoints/test_health_integration.py
🧠 Learnings (2)
📚 Learning: 2025-09-02T11:09:40.404Z
Learnt from: radofuchs
Repo: lightspeed-core/lightspeed-stack PR: 485
File: tests/e2e/features/environment.py:87-95
Timestamp: 2025-09-02T11:09:40.404Z
Learning: In the lightspeed-stack e2e tests, noop authentication tests use the default lightspeed-stack.yaml configuration, while noop-with-token tests use the Authorized tag to trigger a config swap to the specialized noop-with-token configuration file.
Applied to files:
tests/integration/endpoints/test_config_integration.pytests/integration/endpoints/test_info_integration.pytests/integration/endpoints/test_health_integration.py
📚 Learning: 2025-11-24T16:58:04.410Z
Learnt from: CR
Repo: lightspeed-core/lightspeed-stack PR: 0
File: CLAUDE.md:0-0
Timestamp: 2025-11-24T16:58:04.410Z
Learning: Applies to tests/**/*.py : Use `pytest-mock` with AsyncMock objects for mocking in tests
Applied to files:
tests/integration/endpoints/test_info_integration.py
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (8)
- GitHub Check: Konflux kflux-prd-rh02 / lightspeed-stack-on-pull-request
- GitHub Check: build-pr
- GitHub Check: E2E: server mode / azure
- GitHub Check: E2E: server mode / ci
- GitHub Check: E2E: library mode / ci
- GitHub Check: E2E: server mode / vertexai
- GitHub Check: E2E: library mode / vertexai
- GitHub Check: E2E: library mode / azure
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 0
🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
tests/integration/endpoints/test_config_integration.py (2)
50-53: Consider matching the description detail level for consistency.The parameter documentation is accurate, but the descriptions here are noticeably briefer than those in the first test (lines 25-28). For better consistency across the file, consider using a similar level of detail.
For example:
- "Loads root configuration" → "Fixture providing root configuration to be verified"
- "FastAPI request" → "FastAPI request object used to call the endpoint"
72-74: Parameter documentation is accurate.The documentation correctly describes the parameters with appropriate type annotations. Same optional suggestion as the previous test: consider expanding descriptions to match the detail level in the first test for consistency.
📜 Review details
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
tests/integration/endpoints/test_config_integration.pytests/integration/endpoints/test_health_integration.pytests/integration/endpoints/test_info_integration.pytests/integration/endpoints/test_query_v2_integration.py
✅ Files skipped from review due to trivial changes (1)
- tests/integration/endpoints/test_info_integration.py
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (2)
- tests/integration/endpoints/test_query_v2_integration.py
- tests/integration/endpoints/test_health_integration.py
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (2)
tests/{unit,integration}/**/*.py
📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)
tests/{unit,integration}/**/*.py: Use pytest for all unit and integration tests; do not use unittest framework
Unit tests must achieve 60% code coverage; integration tests must achieve 10% coverage
Files:
tests/integration/endpoints/test_config_integration.py
tests/**/*.py
📄 CodeRabbit inference engine (CLAUDE.md)
Use
pytest-mockwith AsyncMock objects for mocking in tests
Files:
tests/integration/endpoints/test_config_integration.py
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (10)
- GitHub Check: Konflux kflux-prd-rh02 / lightspeed-stack-on-pull-request
- GitHub Check: unit_tests (3.13)
- GitHub Check: Pylinter
- GitHub Check: E2E: library mode / azure
- GitHub Check: E2E: library mode / vertexai
- GitHub Check: E2E: server mode / vertexai
- GitHub Check: E2E: library mode / ci
- GitHub Check: E2E: server mode / azure
- GitHub Check: E2E: server mode / ci
- GitHub Check: build-pr
🔇 Additional comments (1)
tests/integration/endpoints/test_config_integration.py (1)
25-28: Documentation improvement looks good!The parameter documentation is clear, accurate, and the type annotations correctly match the function signature.
1 participant
Description
LCORE-1070: better comments in integration tests
Type of change
Tools used to create PR
Summary by CodeRabbit
✏️ Tip: You can customize this high-level summary in your review settings.