Skip to content

Conversation

@ffranr
Copy link
Contributor

@ffranr ffranr commented Nov 24, 2025

  • Add composite cleanup-space action to reclaim runner disk before heavy jobs.
  • Wire LiT integration/unit test job into CI, using local Loop replacements for go.mod and LiT setup node action.

Pull Request Checklist

  • Update release_notes.md if your PR contains major features, breaking changes or bugfixes

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @ffranr, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request enhances the continuous integration pipeline by introducing a mechanism to manage runner disk space and integrating a new testing suite. The disk cleanup action ensures that CI jobs, especially those with high disk requirements, have sufficient resources, while the LiT job expands the test coverage for integration and unit tests.

Highlights

  • Runner Disk Space Cleanup Action: A new composite GitHub Action (cleanup-space) has been added to reclaim disk space on CI runners by removing non-essential tools and packages before heavy jobs.
  • LiT CI Job Integration: A LiT (Loop integration/unit test) job has been wired into the CI pipeline, utilizing local replacements for go.mod and the LiT setup node action.
Ignored Files
  • Ignored by pattern: .github/workflows/** (1)
    • .github/workflows/main.yml
Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request introduces a new composite GitHub Action, cleanup-space, designed to free up disk space on runners. This is a useful addition for resource-intensive CI jobs. The implementation is a good start, but I've identified a couple of areas for improvement in the shell script to ensure it behaves correctly and is easier to debug. My main concerns are around shell globbing behavior and error visibility. Please see my detailed comments.

@ffranr ffranr force-pushed the add-ci-lit-test branch 5 times, most recently from bb81e5a to a60153b Compare November 25, 2025 14:56
@hieblmi hieblmi self-requested a review November 25, 2025 15:09
Copy link
Collaborator

@starius starius left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM! 🚀
Added a couple of nits.

path: |
~/.cache/yarn
lightning-terminal/app/node_modules
key: ${{ runner.os }}-lit-node16-${{ hashFiles('lightning-terminal/app/yarn.lock') }}
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is it time to bump LiT to latest node LTS version? (24)

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This is the action we basically have in taproot-assets right now. I think there's some value in that consistency. I'll try to upgrade both soon. Thanks for the heads up on this.

Copy link
Collaborator

@hieblmi hieblmi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the improvements, LGTM ✅

Just one nit about the first commit, I think we can drop it.

Add a new workflow to run tests for the LiT repository. This includes
setting up dependencies, cloning the repository, and updating the
`go.mod` file to use local Loop modules.
@hieblmi hieblmi merged commit 2cdf084 into lightninglabs:master Nov 26, 2025
9 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants