Skip to content

Testing w/ new_channel / ready_channel #9

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Conversation

ksedgwic
Copy link

No description provided.

@ksedgwic ksedgwic force-pushed the does-travis-work branch from 0ba307d to 6be965f Compare May 25, 2020 22:07
@ksedgwic ksedgwic changed the title Does Travis work? Testing w/ new_channel / ready_channel May 26, 2020
@ksedgwic ksedgwic force-pushed the does-travis-work branch from 6be965f to 9cb4008 Compare May 26, 2020 17:18
@ksedgwic
Copy link
Author

ksedgwic commented Jul 9, 2020

Closing this PR, was used to test CI integration.

@ksedgwic ksedgwic closed this Jul 9, 2020
ksedgwic pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 7, 2022
All build flags and (experimental) options make it hard to find
out what features are supported or enabled.

And the undocumented `--list-features-only`, does not account for all
our featurebits, for example bit 55 (keysend).

Changelog-Added: JSON-RPC: `getinfo` result now includes `our_features` (bits) for various Bolt #9 contexts
ksedgwic pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Mar 3, 2023
This will fix a crash that I caused on armv7
and by looking inside the coredump with gdb
(by adding an assert on n that must be
different from null) I get the following stacktrace

```
(gdb) bt
\#0  0x00000000 in ?? ()
\#1  0x0043a038 in send_backtrace (why=0xbe9e3600 "FATAL SIGNAL 11") at common/daemon.c:36
\#2  0x0043a0ec in crashdump (sig=11) at common/daemon.c:46
\#3  <signal handler called>
\#4  0x00406d04 in node_announcement (map=0x938ecc, nann_off=495146) at common/gossmap.c:586
\#5  0x00406fec in map_catchup (map=0x938ecc, num_rejected=0xbe9e3a40) at common/gossmap.c:643
\#6  0x004073a4 in load_gossip_store (map=0x938ecc, num_rejected=0xbe9e3a40) at common/gossmap.c:697
\#7  0x00408244 in gossmap_load (ctx=0x0, filename=0x4e16b8 "gossip_store", num_channel_updates_rejected=0xbe9e3a40) at common/gossmap.c:976
\#8  0x0041a548 in init (p=0x93831c, buf=0x9399d4 "\n\n{\"jsonrpc\":\"2.0\",\"id\":\"cln:init#25\",\"method\":\"init\",\"params\":{\"options\":{},\"configuration\":{\"lightning-dir\":\"/home/vincent/.lightning/testnet\",\"rpc-file\":\"lightning-rpc\",\"startup\":true,\"network\":\"te"..., config=0x939cdc) at plugins/topology.c:622
\#9  0x0041e5d0 in handle_init (cmd=0x938934, buf=0x9399d4 "\n\n{\"jsonrpc\":\"2.0\",\"id\":\"cln:init#25\",\"method\":\"init\",\"params\":{\"options\":{},\"configuration\":{\"lightning-dir\":\"/home/vincent/.lightning/testnet\",\"rpc-file\":\"lightning-rpc\",\"startup\":true,\"network\":\"te"..., params=0x939c8c)
    at plugins/libplugin.c:1208
\#10 0x0041fc04 in ld_command_handle (plugin=0x93831c, toks=0x939bec) at plugins/libplugin.c:1572
\#11 0x00420050 in ld_read_json_one (plugin=0x93831c) at plugins/libplugin.c:1667
\#12 0x004201bc in ld_read_json (conn=0x9391c4, plugin=0x93831c) at plugins/libplugin.c:1687
\#13 0x004cb82c in next_plan (conn=0x9391c4, plan=0x9391d8) at ccan/ccan/io/io.c:59
\#14 0x004cc67c in do_plan (conn=0x9391c4, plan=0x9391d8, idle_on_epipe=false) at ccan/ccan/io/io.c:407
\#15 0x004cc6dc in io_ready (conn=0x9391c4, pollflags=1) at ccan/ccan/io/io.c:417
\#16 0x004cf8cc in io_loop (timers=0x9383c4, expired=0xbe9e3ce4) at ccan/ccan/io/poll.c:453
\#17 0x00420af4 in plugin_main (argv=0xbe9e3eb4, init=0x41a46c <init>, restartability=PLUGIN_STATIC, init_rpc=true, features=0x0, commands=0x6167e8 <commands>, num_commands=4, notif_subs=0x0, num_notif_subs=0, hook_subs=0x0, num_hook_subs=0, notif_topics=0x0, num_notif_topics=0) at plugins/libplugin.c:1891
\#18 0x0041a6f8 in main (argc=1, argv=0xbe9e3eb4) at plugins/topology.c:679
```

I do not know if this is a solution because I do not know
when I can parse a node announcement for a node that
it is not longer in the gossip map.

So, I hope this is just usefult for @rustyrussell

Changelog-Fixed: fixes `FATAL SIGNAL 11` on gossmap node announcement parsing.

Signed-off-by: Vincenzo Palazzo <vincenzopalazzodev@gmail.com>
ksedgwic pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 21, 2023
The issue is that common_setup() wasn't called by the fuzz target,
leaving secp256k1_ctx as NULL.

UBSan error:

$ UBSAN_OPTIONS="print_stacktrace=1:halt_on_error=1" \
    ./fuzz-channel_id crash-1575b41ef09e62e4c09c165e6dc037a110b113f2

INFO: Running with entropic power schedule (0xFF, 100).
INFO: Seed: 1153355603
INFO: Loaded 1 modules   (25915 inline 8-bit counters): 25915 [0x563bae7ac3a8, 0x563bae7b28e3),
INFO: Loaded 1 PC tables (25915 PCs): 25915 [0x563bae7b28e8,0x563bae817c98),
./fuzz-channel_id: Running 1 inputs 1 time(s) each.
Running: crash-1575b41ef09e62e4c09c165e6dc037a110b113f2
bitcoin/pubkey.c:22:33: runtime error: null pointer passed as argument 1, which is declared to never be null
external/libwally-core/src/secp256k1/include/secp256k1.h:373:3: note: nonnull attribute specified here
    #0 0x563bae41e3db in pubkey_from_der bitcoin/pubkey.c:19:7
    #1 0x563bae4205e0 in fromwire_pubkey bitcoin/pubkey.c:111:7
    #2 0x563bae46437c in run tests/fuzz/fuzz-channel_id.c:42:3
    #3 0x563bae2f6016 in LLVMFuzzerTestOneInput tests/fuzz/libfuzz.c:23:2
    #4 0x563bae20a450 in fuzzer::Fuzzer::ExecuteCallback(unsigned char const*, unsigned long)
    #5 0x563bae1f4c3f in fuzzer::RunOneTest(fuzzer::Fuzzer*, char const*, unsigned long)
    #6 0x563bae1fa6e6 in fuzzer::FuzzerDriver(int*, char***, int (*)(unsigned char const*, unsigned long))
    #7 0x563bae223052 in main (tests/fuzz/fuzz-channel_id+0x181052) (BuildId: f7f56e14ffc06df54ab732d79ea922e773de1f25)
    #8 0x7fa7fa113082 in __libc_start_main
    #9 0x563bae1efbdd in _start

SUMMARY: UndefinedBehaviorSanitizer: undefined-behavior bitcoin/pubkey.c:22:33 in
ksedgwic pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Apr 21, 2023
pubkey_from_hexstr() was failing, which we didn't notice because we
weren't checking the return value. The problem was that we were passing
it a strlen that was half the actual length.

Relevant error:

  [libsecp256k1] illegal argument: !secp256k1_fe_is_zero(&ge->x)

  ==417723== ERROR: libFuzzer: deadly signal
    #7 0x7f5deaacc7fb in abort
    #8 0x51b0b0 in secp256k1_default_illegal_callback_fn secp256k1.c
    #9 0x51bd8e in secp256k1_ec_pubkey_serialize
    #10 0x4e235b in pubkey_to_der bitcoin/pubkey.c:29:7
    #11 0x4e2941 in pubkey_cmp bitcoin/pubkey.c:89:2
    #12 0x4e333d in bitcoin_redeem_2of2 bitcoin/script.c:144:6
    #13 0x4f1396 in run tests/fuzz/fuzz-close_tx.c:78:19
@king-11 king-11 deleted the does-travis-work branch May 1, 2025 10:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant