Open
Description
Issue type (mark with x
)
- π€ Question
- π Bug report
- π Feature request
- π€·ββοΈ Other
Description
Currently, we have some modules implementing their own coverage scripts, but they don't have a standardized way to do it, like an HTML report. The idea of this issue is to discuss if we should add a coverage script for testing or not.
Desired behavior:
Better reports and a standardized way to run JS unit tests' coverage
Current behavior:
We have terminal reports like this one:
but when opening the detailed view using the generated HTML page, this content is shown:
... and we can't click inside these links to get better reports about branches/lines covered