[Bug]: Command Code live model deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash advertises no reasoning efforts #4253

Client or integration

Codex App

Area

Catalog / models

Summary

A newly live Command Code model, deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash (Codex slug command-code/deepseek-deepseek-v4.1-flash), arrives in the injected catalog with supported_reasoning_levels: [] and no default_reasoning_level. In Codex App the reasoning-effort picker is empty / unusable.

This is the same hole as #2883 / #2917: Command Code /provider/v1/models does not carry an effort contract, so the picker is filled only from the static table in src/providers/command-code-efforts.ts. That table still has no row for deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash on current main (checked against https://github.com/lidge-jun/opencodex/blob/main/src/providers/command-code-efforts.ts). configuredReasoningEfforts therefore falls through to the provider-level empty ladder.

The model is a 2026-09-10 live arrival (modelDiscovery.recentArrivals). Vanilla ocx effort model command-code/deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash reports supportedEfforts: [].

Same-class companion on the same account: google/gemini-3.8-flash also has an empty ladder.

Reproduction

1. OpenCodex 2.50.0 with Command Code OAuth (providers.command-code.liveModels = true).
2. Select deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash (it is in selectedModels / live catalog).
3. ocx inspect catalog --json → slug command-code/deepseek-deepseek-v4.1-flash has supported_reasoning_levels: [].
4. Codex App model picker for that slug shows no reasoning-effort rungs.

Stock table keys on main still stop at deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash / deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro / deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash-vision-exp. No deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash row.

Version

2.50.0 (@bitkyc08/opencodex). GitHub main src/providers/command-code-efforts.ts also lacks the row.

Operating system

macOS 26.5.2 (25F84)

Provider and model

command-code / deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash

Also empty: command-code / google/gemini-3.8-flash

Logs or error output

Vanilla (no local overlay):

ocx effort model command-code/deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash --json
{
  "provider": "command-code",
  "model": "deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash",
  "reasoningDisabled": false,
  "supportedEfforts": [],
  "wireMap": null,
  "mappedTiers": {}
}

Catalog entry before overlay: supported_reasoning_levels: [], default_reasoning_level absent.

Suggested ladder (measured, not live-probed)

Same decode recipe as #2917. commandcode.ai profile pages render client-side; the delivered HTML still ships a serialized payload whose compact arrays are effort-table indices.

On a 2026-09-11 fetch of https://commandcode.ai/models/deepseek-v4-1-flash the same page carries already-committed rows, so the index map can be cross-checked:

• gpt-5.6-luna [231,232,233,234,301] → committed low, medium, high, xhigh, max
• google/gemini-3.7-flash [231,232,233] → committed low, medium, high
• z-ai/glm-5.3-flash [231,233,301] → committed low, high, max
• deepseek/deepseek-v4-flash [233,301] → committed high, max
• deepseek/deepseek-v4-pro [233,301] → committed high, max

Therefore:

• deepseek/deepseek-v4.1-flash [231,233,301] → low, high, max
• google/gemini-3.8-flash [231,232,233] → low, medium, high (same-class leftover)

DeepSeek's public thinking-mode table (https://api-docs.deepseek.com/guides/thinking_mode) also documents low / high / max with default high, and maps medium → high, xhigh → high, ultra → max. No authenticated Command Code /alpha/generate accept/reject probe was run.

Profile-page auto-refresh (refreshCommandCodeReasoningEfforts) is still dead for every row, as noted on #2883. A one-line table add is the same fix shape as #2917.

I am not asking to relax modelRecordValue; bridging deepseek-v4-flash onto deepseek-v4.1-flash by stem would be wrong (V4.1 is a different model, and Command Code's own payload already differs: [233,301] vs [231,233,301]).

Checks

• I searched existing issues and documentation (Cannot select reasoning efforts for some models provided by CommandCode #2883 closed for GLM-5.3-Flash only; fix(command-code): add reasoning effort presets for three live models #2647 was the previous live-model table add; no open issue for v4.1-flash).
• I removed secrets, tokens, account details, request credentials, and personal data.