chore: archive go-libp2p-webrtc-direct

[p-shahi]

Summary

Archive said repo

Why do you need this?

For reasons mentioned in this comment: libp2p/go-libp2p-webrtc-direct#53 (comment)

What else do we need to know?

cc: @backkem who is listed as the lead maintainer of the repo

DRI: myself

Reviewer's Checklist

• It is clear where the request is coming from (if unsure, ask)
• All the automated checks passed
• The YAML changes reflect the summary of the request
• The Terraform plan posted as a comment reflects the summary of the request

[github-actions]

Before merge, verify that all the following plans are correct. They will be applied as-is after the merge.

Terraform plans

libp2p

Terraform used the selected providers to generate the following execution
plan. Resource actions are indicated with the following symbols:
  ~ update in-place

Terraform will perform the following actions:

  # github_repository.this["go-libp2p-webrtc-direct"] will be updated in-place
  ~ resource "github_repository" "this" {
      ~ archived               = false -> true
        id                     = "go-libp2p-webrtc-direct"
        name                   = "go-libp2p-webrtc-direct"
        # (27 unchanged attributes hidden)
    }

Plan: 0 to add, 1 to change, 0 to destroy.

[BigLep]

The change itself looks good to me, but I'd like to see an archival notice at the top of https://github.com/libp2p/go-libp2p-webrtc-direct#readme that points someone to why it's deprecated and what is coming along to replace it.

[galargh]

The change itself looks good to me, but I'd like to see an archival notice at the top of https://github.com/libp2p/go-libp2p-webrtc-direct#readme that points someone to why it's deprecated and what is coming along to replace it.

Idea for the future: it'd be cool to be able to prepare it inline in a PR like this one and let the automation stick it on top of the README before archiving it.

[backkem]

Happy to see the official implementation maturing. Great work 👌

[mxinden]

No objections from my end.

[BigLep]

Per above, I'm good to merge. Lets also add a clear notification at the top of the repo.

⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️

Status: Archived and not maintained
Alternatives: link
Questions: ask in the repo above

⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️⚠️

or something like this