Resolves #10 : Making testing-framework module#11
Conversation
|
Do you need all these eggs checked in? |
|
Sorry my mistake! I'll create new pull request |
|
great work @LarsSchaaf, I will take a look later today |
don't worry just remove from this one with a commit or force push a modified version to the same commit, no need for a new pull request :) |
|
@LarsSchaaf do you actually need see: |
|
wait are there even unittests? the tests we have are the science tests here, not ones that |
| version=version["__version__"], | ||
| description=DESCRIPTION, | ||
| long_description=open("README.md").read(), | ||
| install_requires=["scipy", "numpy", "matplotlib", "pandas>=0.21.0", "scipy",], |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
- scipy is duplicated
- ase is not there
- pandas is only used in the demo notebook, not the package
- anything else?
there are optional dependencies, that I wouldn't want to install unless needed, like torch, torchani, pyjulip, etc.
| tests_require=["pytest",], | ||
| author=AUTHOR, | ||
| author_email=AUTHOR_EMAIL, | ||
| package_data={"": ["data/*", "calib/data/*"],}, |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
these directories don't seem to exist
| from setuptools import setup, find_packages | ||
|
|
||
| PACKAGENAME = "testingframework" | ||
| DESCRIPTION = "Module for testing various interatomic potentials" |
|
|
||
| setup( | ||
| name=PACKAGENAME, | ||
| packages=find_packages(), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
there is no __init__.py in the testingframework directory, that may be useful there
| packages=find_packages(), | ||
| version=version["__version__"], | ||
| description=DESCRIPTION, | ||
| long_description=open("README.md").read(), |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
shall we read this in above just like the other parts? just being a little petty here, but with ... as is nicer for this, even though we can be pretty sure that the file will be closed properly like this as well.
|
Finally, @LarsSchaaf can you confirm that you have installed this and used the testing of a model correctly and this reproduces the behaviour as before, or that you can document how the testing should be modified now? Once all these are done, I think it would be useful if you asked @jameskermode and @bernstei to take a look as well, because they are the longest standing users here perhaps. |
3 participants
Done:
Still to do: Implementing
versioneer