Add RLS policies to invitations table #1520
Merged
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
![devin-ai-integration[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/811515?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
Co-Authored-By: noritaka.ikeda@route06.co.jp <noritaka.ikeda@route06.co.jp>
|
|
The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for Git ↗︎
|
🤖 Devin AI EngineerI'll be helping with this pull request! Here's what you should know: ✅ I will automatically:
Note: I can only respond to comments from users who have write access to this repository. ⚙️ Control Options:
|
|
Updates to Preview Branch (devin/1745584435-add-rls-to-invitations-table) ↗︎
Tasks are run on every commit but only new migration files are pushed.
View logs for this Workflow Run ↗︎. |
CI Feedback 🧐(Feedback updated until commit 1260960)A test triggered by this PR failed. Here is an AI-generated analysis of the failure:
|
Co-Authored-By: noritaka.ikeda@route06.co.jp <noritaka.ikeda@route06.co.jp>
| ALTER TABLE "public"."invitations" ENABLE ROW LEVEL SECURITY; | ||
|
|
||
| -- Policies for authenticated users | ||
| CREATE POLICY "authenticated_users_can_select_org_invitations" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
- Authenticated users can view, create, update, and delete invitations only within organizations they are members of.
- Service role can fully manage invitations without restriction.
Currently, broader permissions are granted because full feature implementation is still in progress.
If you're curious where this table is used, try grepping for.from('invitations')in the codebase.
NoritakaIkeda
requested review from
hoshinotsuyoshi,
FunamaYukina,
junkisai,
MH4GF and
NoritakaIkeda
and removed request for
a team
PR Reviewer Guide 🔍Here are some key observations to aid the review process:
|
PR Code Suggestions ✨Explore these optional code suggestions:
|
|||||||||
|
This migration adds RLS policies for the invitations table with both authenticated and service_role roles, but duplicates are visible between the schema file and a dedicated migration file. The primary concern is migration safety and potential data integrity issues due to duplicate policy definitions and lack of explicit transaction wrapping, which could lead to runtime conflicts and performance slowdowns. On the positive side, the new policies follow naming conventions and enhance security controls, reinforcing organization-based access as per project guidelines. ER Diagram:
|
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
This PR adds RLS (Row Level Security) policies to the invitations table which already has an organization_id column. It follows the pattern established for other tables with organization-based security.
What was added
Link to Devin run
https://app.devin.ai/sessions/baba505ac02a479fbea6339c2f8a25f9
Requested by: noritaka.ikeda@route06.co.jp