staging: lustre: ldlm: Fix indentation errors for switch-case

checkpatch complains about two indentation errors where the case statements are on a higher indentation level than the corresponding switch statement. This patch removes these errors. Signed-off-by: Andreas Ruprecht <rupran@einserver.de> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
lhanjian · Nov 26, 2014 · 0e1bbbb · 0e1bbbb
1 parent 43ee416
commit 0e1bbbb
Show file tree

Hide file tree

Showing 2 changed files with 25 additions and 25 deletions.
diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_lock.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_lock.c
@@ -1823,24 +1823,24 @@ int ldlm_run_ast_work(struct ldlm_namespace *ns, struct list_head *rpc_list,
 	arg->list = rpc_list;
 
 	switch (ast_type) {
-		case LDLM_WORK_BL_AST:
-			arg->type = LDLM_BL_CALLBACK;
-			work_ast_lock = ldlm_work_bl_ast_lock;
-			break;
-		case LDLM_WORK_CP_AST:
-			arg->type = LDLM_CP_CALLBACK;
-			work_ast_lock = ldlm_work_cp_ast_lock;
-			break;
-		case LDLM_WORK_REVOKE_AST:
-			arg->type = LDLM_BL_CALLBACK;
-			work_ast_lock = ldlm_work_revoke_ast_lock;
-			break;
-		case LDLM_WORK_GL_AST:
-			arg->type = LDLM_GL_CALLBACK;
-			work_ast_lock = ldlm_work_gl_ast_lock;
-			break;
-		default:
-			LBUG();
+	case LDLM_WORK_BL_AST:
+		arg->type = LDLM_BL_CALLBACK;
+		work_ast_lock = ldlm_work_bl_ast_lock;
+		break;
+	case LDLM_WORK_CP_AST:
+		arg->type = LDLM_CP_CALLBACK;
+		work_ast_lock = ldlm_work_cp_ast_lock;
+		break;
+	case LDLM_WORK_REVOKE_AST:
+		arg->type = LDLM_BL_CALLBACK;
+		work_ast_lock = ldlm_work_revoke_ast_lock;
+		break;
+	case LDLM_WORK_GL_AST:
+		arg->type = LDLM_GL_CALLBACK;
+		work_ast_lock = ldlm_work_gl_ast_lock;
+		break;
+	default:
+		LBUG();
 	}
 
 	/* We create a ptlrpc request set with flow control extension.

diff --git a/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_request.c b/drivers/staging/lustre/lustre/ldlm/ldlm_request.c
@@ -1419,14 +1419,14 @@ static ldlm_policy_res_t ldlm_cancel_no_wait_policy(struct ldlm_namespace *ns,
 	/* don't check added & count since we want to process all locks
 	 * from unused list */
 	switch (lock->l_resource->lr_type) {
-		case LDLM_EXTENT:
-		case LDLM_IBITS:
-			if (cb && cb(lock))
-				break;
-		default:
-			result = LDLM_POLICY_SKIP_LOCK;
-			lock->l_flags |= LDLM_FL_SKIPPED;
+	case LDLM_EXTENT:
+	case LDLM_IBITS:
+		if (cb && cb(lock))
 			break;
+	default:
+		result = LDLM_POLICY_SKIP_LOCK;
+		lock->l_flags |= LDLM_FL_SKIPPED;
+		break;
 	}
 
 	unlock_res_and_lock(lock);