Fix docs for rate limiter tests #206
Conversation
Reviewer's GuideThis PR refines test documentation and examples by updating lint attributes and runtime fixture style, enriching rate limiter test comments (including virtual time, shared bucket, and burst capacity), clarifying generics support in wireframe_testing utilities, and improving the LoggerHandle example to show log assertions. Class diagram for LoggerHandle example updateclassDiagram
class LoggerHandle {
+new()
+pop() Option<LogRecord>
}
class LogRecord
LoggerHandle --o LogRecord : manages
File-Level Changes
Tips and commandsInteracting with Sourcery
Customizing Your ExperienceAccess your dashboard to:
Getting Help
|
|
Warning Rate limit exceeded@leynos has exceeded the limit for the number of commits or files that can be reviewed per hour. Please wait 10 minutes and 17 seconds before requesting another review. ⌛ How to resolve this issue?After the wait time has elapsed, a review can be triggered using the We recommend that you space out your commits to avoid hitting the rate limit. 🚦 How do rate limits work?CodeRabbit enforces hourly rate limits for each developer per organization. Our paid plans have higher rate limits than the trial, open-source and free plans. In all cases, we re-allow further reviews after a brief timeout. Please see our FAQ for further information. 📒 Files selected for processing (1)
Summary by CodeRabbit
WalkthroughAdd or enhance documentation comments in test and utility modules, clarifying test behaviours, usage examples, and supported types. Update logging doc tests to use warnings instead of info logs. Adjust lint attributes and syntax in a test runtime fixture, without changing any functionality or public interfaces. Changes
Possibly related PRs
Poem
✨ Finishing Touches
🧪 Generate unit tests
🪧 TipsChatThere are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:
SupportNeed help? Create a ticket on our support page for assistance with any issues or questions. Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments. CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)
Other keywords and placeholders
CodeRabbit Configuration File (
|
![sourcery-ai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/48477?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hey @leynos - I've reviewed your changes and they look great!
Prompt for AI Agents
Please address the comments from this code review:
## Individual Comments
### Comment 1
<location> `wireframe_testing/src/lib.rs:5` </location>
<code_context>
//!
//! These helpers spawn the application on a `tokio::io::duplex` stream and
-//! return all bytes written by the app for easy assertions.
+//! return all bytes written by the app for easy assertions. They work with any
+//! message implementing [`bincode::Encode`] – the example uses a simple `u8`
+//! value so no generics are required.
</code_context>
<issue_to_address>
The documentation now references `bincode::Encode`, which is not a real trait.
`bincode::Encode` is not a valid trait; bincode relies on `serde::Serialize` for encoding. Please update the reference to `serde::Serialize` to prevent confusion.
</issue_to_address>Help me be more useful! Please click 👍 or 👎 on each comment and I'll use the feedback to improve your reviews.
| //! | ||
| //! These helpers spawn the application on a `tokio::io::duplex` stream and | ||
| //! return all bytes written by the app for easy assertions. | ||
| //! return all bytes written by the app for easy assertions. They work with any |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
issue: The documentation now references bincode::Encode, which is not a real trait.
bincode::Encode is not a valid trait; bincode relies on serde::Serialize for encoding. Please update the reference to serde::Serialize to prevent confusion.
![codescene-delta-analysis[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/53921?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 2
📜 Review details
Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI
Review profile: ASSERTIVE
Plan: Pro
📒 Files selected for processing (4)
tests/push.rs(3 hunks)tests/push_policies.rs(1 hunks)wireframe_testing/src/lib.rs(1 hunks)wireframe_testing/src/logging.rs(1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
📓 Path-based instructions (1)
**/*.rs
Instructions used from:
Sources:
📄 CodeRabbit Inference Engine
- AGENTS.md
⚙️ CodeRabbit Configuration File
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 240000ms. You can increase the timeout in your CodeRabbit configuration to a maximum of 15 minutes (900000ms). (2)
- GitHub Check: build-test
- GitHub Check: Analyze (actions)
🔇 Additional comments (5)
wireframe_testing/src/lib.rs (1)
5-7: Excellent documentation enhancement.The clarification about
bincode::Encodetrait support improves understanding of the utilities' generic nature whilst keeping the example simple and accessible.wireframe_testing/src/logging.rs (1)
46-46: Doc test improvement using appropriate log level.Changing from
info!towarn!provides a better example for log assertion testing, as warnings are more commonly captured and verified in test scenarios.Also applies to: 49-49
tests/push.rs (3)
60-61: Excellent explanatory comment for test context.The clarification about virtual-time context using
tokio::time::pausehelps readers understand why time manipulation works effectively in this test environment.
112-113: Clear explanation of shared rate limiting behaviour.The comment effectively explains why pushes from different priority queues affect each other's rate limits, clarifying the shared token bucket implementation.
149-149: Helpful clarification of burst capacity relationship.The comment clearly connects the test's burst behaviour to the configured capacity parameter, improving test comprehension.
Co-authored-by: coderabbitai[bot] <136622811+coderabbitai[bot]@users.noreply.github.com>
1 participant
Summary
wireframe_testingdocsLoggerHandleexampleTesting
make lintmake testhttps://chatgpt.com/codex/tasks/task_e_6873af46cde88322838d3bc1ccfe0c33
Summary by Sourcery
Improve documentation and linting in rate limiter tests and update testing utilities examples
Enhancements:
Documentation:
Tests: