"Everyone should go back to COBOL! Make America Procedural Again!" ~ @anonymous
A large program is a costly program, and not just because of the time, it takes to build. Size almost always involves complexity, and complexity could confuse programmers. Confused programmers, in turn, tend to introduce mistakes (bugs) into programs. Functional Programming can help to make the code predictable and easy to debug, abstract control flows and operations on data with functions.
Functional Programming is about pulling programs apart and reassembling them from the same parts, abstracted behind function boundaries, but it's not a matter of just applying functions to come up with a result; the goal, rather, is to abstract control flows and operations on data with functions in order to avoid side effects and reduce mutation of state in your application.
Functional Programming it is not new, but becomes more popular these days, because lies at the heart of both of the dominant frameworks out there:
ReactJS and Angular (AngularJS and VueJS not covered here) are the most popular library and framework according to latest Google trends:
Functional Programming is not new but becomes more popular these days because of lies at the heart of both of the dominant frameworks in the market:
Disclaimer: This is a just a brief point-of-view about the most obvious function programming influences inside these two tools. It will be definitely a lot more functional programming methodologies if we continue digging deeper, we are just scratching the surface.
-
Simplicity: Functional programming emphasizes immutability, which makes it easier to reason about code and avoid bugs. -
Modularity: Functions in functional programming are small and do one thing well, making it easy to reuse and compose them. -
Concurrency: Because functions are immutable and don't have side effects, they can be easily parallelized and run concurrently. -
Easier testing: Functions that are pure (have no side effects) are easy to test, as their output is determined solely by their input. -
Improved performance: Functional programming can lead to improved performance through techniques like lazy evaluation and memoization. -
Better code readability: Functional programming uses a declarative style, which makes it easier to understand and reason about code. -
Thread safety: Immutable objects are useful in multi-threaded applications because multiple threads can act on the data of immutable objects without worrying about changes to the data by other threads. As immutable objects are closed to change, it is safe to assume that they will stay unchanged while we access the object from different threads. -
Referential transparency: Referential transparency generally means that we can always replace a function with its return value without an effect on the application's behavior. Referential transparency is a guarantee of code reusability. -
Low coupling: Coupling is the measure of code dependency. We always want toreduce couplingand make our code components as independent of each other as possible. Low coupling allows us to change a component without affecting other code components. Immutability helps in achieving low coupling. Immutable data can be safely passed through different code blocks without worrying about it being transformed and affecting other parts of the code. Pure functions transform the data and return the result without affecting the input data. -
Failure atomicity: A class can be left in a broken state if it throws a runtime exception. Immutability prevents this problem. An object will never be left in a broken state because its state is modified only during its initialization.
-
Parallelization: Immutability makes it easier to parallelize code execution as there are no conflicts among objects and instances.
-
State comparison: The state of an application is the state of all its objects at a given time. The state changes rapidly over time, and an application needs to change state in order to continue running. Immutable objects, however, have a fixed state over time. Once created, the state of an immutable object does not change,
Redux can be described in three fundamental principles:
-
Single source of truth: The state of our whole application is stored in an object tree within a single store.
-
The state is read-only: The only way to change the state is to emit an action, an object describing what happened.
-
Changes are made with pure functions: To specify how the state tree is transformed by actions, we write pure reducers.
-
Further information: https://redux.js.org/introduction/three-principles
- Using "immutability" as a principle and avoiding shared mutable DOM is the motivation for its architecture and unidirectional data flow.
* Using immutability "read-only props" (inputs argument of a Component granting immutability and avoiding side-effects), we can also re-enforce the concept of immutability using Facebook's immutability.JS, let's remember that const declaration protects against reassignment but not against mutation.
* `The react-redux connect() function is a purely "curried"` one *0
* `Using "memoization" to cache the results of a component render() method`, or simply the returned JSX of a functional component, so Memoization can be applied to both class and functional components, the feature is implemented has HOCs and React Hooks, using class base component .setState(previousState: {}, props: {}) to manage the state and avoid state mutations. * Even more after `React 16.8+ there we can use React Hooks that includes several 'use*' allow us to add functionality to functional components` instead Class base components like:
useState(currentState: {}, newState: {}) ) * `React's development guidelines promote the creation of stateless component` so this should grant that the output of a component only depends on its 'props'. `A "stateless" component looks a lot like a "pure function"`, and indeed it is. So, as we can see React promotes more Functional-Oriented than Object-Oriented practices *2
- `React have unidirectional data flow`, but 2-way data binding can be achieved
<input onChange(props: changed) value(props.name) />- React also have a commonly used lifecycle method: render()
// class component
class MyComponent extends Component {
state = {};
render() { // pure function
const { contact } = this.props;
return (
<div className="card card-body mb-3" >
<ul className="list-group">
<li className="list-group-item">{contact.email}</li>
<li className="list-group-item">{contact.location}</li>
</ul>
</div>
)
}
}Have unidirectional data flow as well.It has the option of [()] two-way data binding but it is not encouraged because of performance could becoming an issue as applications grew, and keeping track of the data flow could be an even bigger problem.
* `Strict immutability`: Angular gives us the option to utilize a centralized state tree with effortless cooperation of change detection property in the @Component decorator of ChangeDetectionStrategy property, by setting the .onPush() instead of the pre-defined .default() change detection strategy we are signing a contract with Angular that obliges us to work with immutable objects, so we explicitly telling Angular that our component only depends on its inputs and all of them are immutables.
@Component({
selector: 'app-root',
templateUrl: './app.component.html',
styleUrls: ['./app.component.css'],
changeDetection: ChangeDetectionStrategy.OnPush // OnPush strategy
})
export class AppComponent {
constructor(){}
}Like React, we can also re-enforce the concept of immutability using Facebook's immutability.JS, let's remember that 'const' declaration protects against reassignment but not against mutation.
Angular give us the chance to cache results of the pure pipes.In fact, all pipes in Angular are pure by default. Pure pipes like are like pure functions: They produce the same output when invoked with the same set of arguments. Such pipes hold the referential transparency property.
* `Using RxJS is a library of utility operators that act on streams by way of Higher-order-Functions`, its used extensively throughout Angular, but Angular API is highly influenced by OOP ideas and less influenced by FP ideas, but according to "Alan Kay", the investigator for all modern OOP, "The essence of OOP is: Encapsulation and Message Passing. So OOP is just another approach to "avoiding sharing mutable state and side-effects".
* `We already have RxJS reactive extensions bundled up in our Angular application.` Embracing their power will allow us to use the principles of Redux without having the need to introduce specific terminologies like actions and reducers. * `We have data-pipeline, we use the "pipable"` operators that are provided by the RxJS library to transform data from producer to consumer by using functional programming.
import { from } from './rxjs';
import { map } from './rxjs';
const fooValues = [{ n:1, n:2, n:3}]
from(fooValues)
.pipe(map(({n}) => n)) // data-pipeline
.subscribe(x => console.log(x));* As we already mention. `Redux the core counts similar principle`.
- Redux & Context API: If you just want to pass data through your application, React's Context API does a pretty great job. On a small application, Redux's formalism may be overkill. However, Redux really shines when we get some of the side effects and debugging starts to become a routine task.
Redux, keeps a record of every change to your data (Reducer), allowing you to essentially "travel back in time" to see what caused your bug.
To achieve this it uses the Immutability. Redux organize the application state into simple objects and update this read-only state by replacing it with a new state (no mutate).
- @ngrx/store is an RxJS stream, is a Redux implementation for Angular. Implements the Redux architectural pattern and principles using the well-known RxJS observables of Angular.
* Now, if we extend a bit Angular to enterprise levels: We can pick up Angular, RxJS and Redux (@ngrx/store *1), we will actually encounter key functional concepts at the core of what we learn: "pure functions", "immutability", "state", "mutation", "composition" or "reactive". We like more the idea of triggering "actions" that will invoke a "reducer" (pure and immutable function) and/or "@Effect" (impure Class) in Redux than invoking a method in a Service Class in Angular. * Following the idea of using Redux: This model of data flow aligns well with the architecture of React and especially well with an application designed using the ideas of Flux.
In fact, and just to finish it, other popular frameworks like VueJS, which use Vuex (similar to Redux) use the "mutate" the state in a predictable fashion way, it has a reactive state which means that we can modify the state in an imperative way.
*0 react-redux.js.org
*1 Redux (@ngrx/store) best practices
*2 So What About Inheritance?
*3 Facebook immutable-js
Functional Programming becomes, for very good reasons, an important trend to learn and it relies on the essence of the most popular frameworks, and this becomes even more obvious when the application starts escalating to an enterprise-level and complexity and number of components that communicates and interact each-other requires communication across remote-siblings relying on having the same updated and unique data.
https://tech.io/playgrounds/24002/fp-workshop
-
Goodbye, OOP https://medium.com/@cscalfani/goodbye-object-oriented-programming-a59cda4c0e53
-
BOOKS: Mostly Adequate Guide to Functional Programming https://mostly-adequate.gitbooks.io/mostly-adequate-guide/
-
Thinking in Ramda (R) http://randycoulman.com/blog/categories/thinking-in-ramda/
-
Professor Frisby Introduces Composable Functional JavaScript https://egghead.io/courses/professor-frisby-introduces-composable-functional-javascript
-
Functors, Applicatives, And Monads In Pictures http://adit.io/posts/2013-04-17-functors,_applicatives,_and_monads_in_pictures.html
-
Essential Functions Support https://mostly-adequate.gitbooks.io/mostly-adequate-guide/appendix_a.html
-
Functional Programming HOWTO https://docs.python.org/3/howto/functional.html
-
Master the JavaScript Interview: What is Functional Programming? https://medium.com/javascript-scene/master-the-javascript-interview-what-is-functional-programming-7f218c68b3a0
-
JavaScript Functional Programming Cookbook (ES6) https://github.com/js-functional/js-funcional
-
Functional Programming in Javascript http://reactivex.io/learnrx/
-
Functional Programming with ECMAScript6 http://www.zsoltnagy.eu/functional-programming-with-es6/
-
Functional Programming in JavaScript https://tech.shutterstock.com/2016/04/20/functional-programming-in-javascript/
-
Thinking Functionally with JavaScript https://www.slideshare.net/LuisAtencio3/thinking-functionally-with-javascript
-
functional programming https://www.slideshare.net/LuisAtencio3/379008rc217functionalprogramming
-
functional-programming-for-the-advanced-beginner https://www.slideshare.net/LuisAtencio3/functional-programming-for-the-advanced-beginner
-
functional-programming-in-javascript (browsable book, exercises and code) https://livebook.manning.com/#!/book/functional-programming-in-javascript/chapter-1/10
-
Functional vs Imperative Patterns in JavaScript https://dev.to/joelnet/functional-vs-imperative-patterns-in-javascript-505h
-
Swift Functional Programming - Second Edition (https://www.oreilly.com/library/view/swift-functional-programming/9781787284500/)