Repository navigation
Conversation
github-actions
Bot
added
the
toolchain-available
mhuisi
approved these changes
Oct 12, 2026
mhuisi
left a comment
mhuisi
left a comment
Contributor
There was a problem hiding this comment.
This is a reasonable quick-fix. Do you know if there would be any significant breakage from adjusting JsonNumber to support positive exponents?
This branch has not been deployed
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
2 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR limits exponents accepted by
Json.parseto100_000. Beyond that, theJsonNumberrepresentation either becomes prohibitively slow or panics.