-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1k
feat(MeasureTheory/Measure/TypeClass/NoAtoms) add exists_accPt_of_noAtoms
#32851
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
Added a theorem that states if a set has positive s-dimensional Hausdorff measure, then it has an accumulation point, along with necessary proofs.
feat(MeasureTheory/Measure/Hausdorff) ∀ 𝑠 > 0, ∀ 𝐸 ⊂ 𝑅^𝑛, 𝐻^𝑠 (𝐸)>0 ⇒ ∃ 𝑥 ∈ 𝑅^𝑛 , 𝑥 is an accumulation point of 𝑃(𝐸).
PR summary 98379c78c5Import changes for modified filesNo significant changes to the import graph Import changes for all files
Declarations diff
You can run this locally as follows## summary with just the declaration names:
./scripts/declarations_diff.sh <optional_commit>
## more verbose report:
./scripts/declarations_diff.sh long <optional_commit>The doc-module for No changes to technical debt.You can run this locally as
|
🚨 PR Title Needs FormattingPlease update the title to match our commit style conventions. Errors from script: Details on the required title formatThe title should fit the following format:
|
I removed the simp using simp? to find the appropriate simp only statement
Refactor the theorem to use a more general type for the set and include separability condition. I tried to take into account the suggestions, but I may have missed some. The theorem needed some bigger reworking after the generalization
generalization and change of location Added a theorem to show that if a set has positive measure under an atomless measure, then it has an accumulation point.
+ found a simplification
Added lemma for discrete topology based on no accumulation points.
Introduce lemma for discrete topology with no AccPts
|
Can you update the PR title and description? |
exists_accPt_of_pos_hausdorffMeasure exists_accPt_of_noAtoms
Removed lemma about discrete topology for sets with no accumulation points.
CoolRmal
left a comment
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I think this is ready to be merged after some minor changes.
|
Could you close the discussions for which you think they have been dealt with? It helps the reviewers to see what remains to be done. |
Co-authored-by: Yongxi (Aaron) Lin <97214596+CoolRmal@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Yongxi (Aaron) Lin <97214596+CoolRmal@users.noreply.github.com>
Moved out of the partial ordering section, factored some variables out the `exists_accPt_of_noAtoms ` theorem
added section wrappers around the theorem to prevent issues with `μ : Measure α` versus the partial measure `α`
Refactor the `exists_accPt_of_noAtoms` theorem for clarity and structure. -Removed the section for the theorem -Changed the assumptions to make them weaker -Changed where the open statements are Still to be done: See if I can refactor and make the assumptions even weaker.
Changed the assumptions for `exists_accPt_of_noAtoms` from [EPseudometricSpace] to [TopologicalSpace X]
feat(MeasureTheory/Measure/TypeClass/NoAtoms): Added a theorem that states If a set has positive measure under an atomless measure, then it has an accumulation point.
Added a lemma in (Topology/DiscreteSubset): If a subset of a topological space has no accumulation points,
then it carries the discrete topology.
Theorem added:
exists_accPt_of_pos_hausdorffMeasureLemma added:
discreteTopology_of_noAccPtsHarmonic's Aristotle gave the initial version of the proofs. I did substantial work shortening the proof from 40 lines and refactoring it into another Lemma.
Special thanks to @plp127 and @CoolRmal for the useful feedback in the PR process.
**Co-authored-by: @Aristotle-Harmonic **
---