[Merged by Bors] - chore: classify was rw porting notes#10692
Closed
pitmonticone wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
Closed
[Merged by Bors] - chore: classify was rw porting notes#10692pitmonticone wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
was rw porting notes#10692pitmonticone wants to merge 1 commit intomasterfrom
Conversation
pitmonticone
added
awaiting-review
easy
Member
|
maintainer merge |
|
🚀 Pull request has been placed on the maintainer queue by kbuzzard. |
github-actions
bot
added
the
maintainer-merge
Member
|
Whilst I would prefer issues which covered hundreds of porting notes rather than just 8, several of the examples here are where |
ghost
added
ready-to-merge
Contributor
|
bors merge |
Contributor
|
Already running a review |
mathlib-bors bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 20, 2024
Classifies by adding issue number (#10691) to porting notes claiming `was rw`.
Contributor
|
Build failed (retrying...):
|
mathlib-bors bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 20, 2024
Classifies by adding issue number (#10691) to porting notes claiming `was rw`.
Contributor
|
Build failed (retrying...): |
mathlib-bors bot
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 20, 2024
Classifies by adding issue number (#10691) to porting notes claiming `was rw`.
Contributor
|
Pull request successfully merged into master. Build succeeded: |
mathlib-bors
bot
changed the title
was rw porting noteswas rw porting notes
thorimur
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 24, 2024
Classifies by adding issue number (#10691) to porting notes claiming `was rw`.
thorimur
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Feb 26, 2024
Classifies by adding issue number (#10691) to porting notes claiming `was rw`.
riccardobrasca
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 1, 2024
Classifies by adding issue number (#10691) to porting notes claiming `was rw`.
dagurtomas
pushed a commit
that referenced
this pull request
Mar 22, 2024
Classifies by adding issue number (#10691) to porting notes claiming `was rw`.
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
4 participants
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Classifies by adding issue number (#10691) to porting notes claiming
was rw.