fix definition of \IfLabelExistsT, \IfLabelExistsF

[mbertucci47]

READ ME FIRST: Please understand that in most cases we will not be able to merge a pull request because there are a lot of internal activities needed when updating the LaTeX2e sources. If you have a code suggestion please discuss it with the team first.

Pull requests in this repository are intended for LaTeX Team members only.

Internal housekeeping

The definitions for \IfLabelExistsT and \IfLabelExistsF are currently the same as \IfPropertyExistsT and \IfPropertyExistsF which is wrong. They should be defined with \property_if_recorded:... like \IfLabelExistsTF.

I changed the date but not the version and did not add a changed entry. Let me know if either is necessary.

Status of pull request

• Ready to merge

Checklist of required changes before merge will be approved

• Test file(s) added
• Version and date string updated in changed source files
• Relevant \changes entries in source included
• Relevant changes.txt updated
• Rollback provided (if necessary)?
• ltnewsX.tex (and/or latexchanges.tex) updated

[mbertucci47]

I see it's failing a test. I don't know enough about l3build to know which command to run to regenerate the files, please let me know and I'll do that ASAP

[u-fischer]

Ups. Yes I think an \changes entry, a version change and also an entry in changes.txt is needed

The test is failing because it is contains the same copy&paste error:

\IfLabelExistsT {name\propsuffix}{true}

that should be \labelsuffix.

[mbertucci47]

I've added a changes entry, version update, entry to changes.txt, and fixed the test file. Hopefully should be good to go now

[FrankMittelbach]

looks good to me (assuming the tests now pass)

[muzimuzhi]

ltnewsX entry needed?

[FrankMittelbach]

I think not really, it is a straight forward bug in stuff that was made available only recently. But of course it wouldn't hurt either.