Skip to content

[12.x] Add comprehensive test coverage for LazyCollection diff methods #55032

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Conversation

mohammadrasoulasghari
Copy link
Contributor

Add comprehensive test coverage for LazyCollection comparison methods

In this PR, I've added thorough test coverage for several LazyCollection comparison methods that previously lacked tests to verify their behavior across different scenarios. 🧪

Methods covered in this PR:

  • diff: Tests how the method identifies values present in the original collection but absent in the compared collection ✅
  • diffUsing: Tests custom value comparison with a callback function, enabling more flexible difference detection 🔄
  • diffAssoc: Tests associative comparison that considers both keys and values, returning items with unique key-value combinations 📊
  • diffKeys: Tests key-only comparison, ensuring items with keys not present in the compared collection are properly returned 🔑
  • diffKeysUsing: Tests custom key comparison logic with a callback function, demonstrating advanced use cases like numeric grouping 🧩

Test scenarios included:

  • Standard collection comparisons with mixed matching/non-matching elements
  • Edge cases with identical keys but different values
  • Custom comparison logic for specialized filtering needs
  • Numeric key grouping and custom string comparison scenarios
  • Verification that each method properly returns a new LazyCollection instance

These tests ensure that the comparison methods work correctly under various conditions and handle all scenarios according to their intended functionality, providing greater confidence in the LazyCollection implementation's correctness and reliability.

Related work

This PR builds upon my previous contribution where I added tests for other LazyCollection methods (collapseWithKeys, containsOneItem, doesntContain, dot, hasAny). Together, these PRs significantly improve the test coverage of the LazyCollection class, helping maintain code quality and prevent regressions. 🚀

This commit adds test coverage for two LazyCollection methods:
- diff: Tests comparing collections and returning elements not present in the given array
- diffUsing: Tests comparing collections with custom comparison logic including case-insensitive string comparison and numeric division-based comparison
@mohammadrasoulasghari mohammadrasoulasghari force-pushed the tests/lazy-collection-test-coverage branch from 9a0792b to 6905e9b Compare March 14, 2025 19:11
This commit adds thorough tests for three key diff methods in the LazyCollection class:

1. testDiffAssoc: Tests the diffAssoc method which returns items that exist in the
   original collection but not in the given collection, comparing both keys and values.

2. testDiffKeys: Tests the diffKeys method which returns items from the original
   collection whose keys don't exist in the given collection.

3. testDiffKeysUsing: Tests the diffKeysUsing method with a custom comparison callback
   that groups keys by hundreds, demonstrating how to implement custom key comparison logic.

These tests ensure proper functionality of collection difference operations and verify
that each method returns a new LazyCollection instance.
@mohammadrasoulasghari mohammadrasoulasghari force-pushed the tests/lazy-collection-test-coverage branch from 6905e9b to 2b02414 Compare March 14, 2025 19:12
@mohammadrasoulasghari mohammadrasoulasghari deleted the tests/lazy-collection-test-coverage branch March 18, 2025 13:48
@mohammadrasoulasghari mohammadrasoulasghari restored the tests/lazy-collection-test-coverage branch March 20, 2025 16:50
@mohammadrasoulasghari
Copy link
Contributor Author

@taylorotwell

I would really like to know the reason why this PR was closed so I can consider it next time.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants