Make routes more dynamic #41
Merged
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Addition for issue #13, This makes customizing routes easier. Jetstream routes are defined the same way.
Remove the [] around single action controllers
|
I'll need to check why the email verification routes don't work. |
calling the invoke method is needed, otherwise the route won't work.
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Addition for issue #13, This makes customizing routes easier.
Jetstream routes are also defined this way.
For instance: I needed to customize the url paths. So i turned the default routes off with the Fortify::ignoreRoutes(); option in my provider and copied the routes file. After that, the controller paths were broken. This commit fixes that scenario.