Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Rename judge0 engine package #1136

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 22, 2024
Merged

Conversation

anunnakian
Copy link
Contributor

Issue

Related to #1066

Change

Move judge0 code execution engine package from dev.langchain4j.code to dev.langchain4j.code.judge0

General checklist

  • There are no breaking changes
  • I have added unit and integration tests for my change
  • I have manually run all the unit and integration tests in the module I have added/changed, and they are all green
  • I have manually run all the unit and integration tests in the core and main modules, and they are all green

Checklist for adding new model integration

  • I have added my new module in the BOM

Checklist for adding new embedding store integration

  • I have added a {NameOfIntegration}EmbeddingStoreIT that extends from either EmbeddingStoreIT or EmbeddingStoreWithFilteringIT
  • I have added my new module in the BOM

Checklist for changing existing embedding store integration

  • I have manually verified that the {NameOfIntegration}EmbeddingStore works correctly with the data persisted using the latest released version of LangChain4j

Copy link
Collaborator

@langchain4j langchain4j left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@anunnakian thank you!

@langchain4j langchain4j marked this pull request as ready for review May 22, 2024 06:27
@langchain4j langchain4j merged commit 2e5f993 into langchain4j:main May 22, 2024
6 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants