Skip to content

Logger: default config missing double quato #1235

New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from
Closed

Logger: default config missing double quato #1235

wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

sueken5
Copy link

@sueken5 sueken5 commented Nov 30, 2018

missing double quato , so it is not json format.

@sueken5 sueken5 changed the title missing double quato Logger: default config missing double quato Nov 30, 2018
@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Nov 30, 2018

Codecov Report

Merging #1235 into master will not change coverage.
The diff coverage is n/a.

Impacted file tree graph

@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1235   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   81.57%   81.57%           
=======================================
  Files          26       26           
  Lines        1927     1927           
=======================================
  Hits         1572     1572           
  Misses        248      248           
  Partials      107      107
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
middleware/logger.go 85.18% <ø> (ø) ⬆️

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update a8de73e...b76e39a. Read the comment docs.

@skrassiev
Copy link
Contributor

not missing, but the single double quote has been accidentally introduced. See history of changes and #1232

@roberto-nascimento
Copy link

Hello there is a better one, https://github.com/labstack/echo/pull/1232/files, latency is a number.

@sueken5
Copy link
Author

sueken5 commented Dec 5, 2018

surely, https://github.com/labstack/echo/pull/1232/files is better.

I close this pull request .

@sueken5 sueken5 closed this Dec 5, 2018
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants