-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 14.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Reword / improve authentication reference #50003
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
✅ Pull request preview available for checkingBuilt without sensitive environment variables
To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration. |
@windsonsea would you be willing to review this for SIG Docs? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This may need a technical review.
Oops, year in branch name is wrong. |
9b54aa7
to
b3fe8c8
Compare
@kubernetes/sig-auth-pr-reviews does this change look right? Any concerns? |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
/lgtm
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: 6e871e6b19ebd823fedbc7040e839b3757412ac8
|
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: windsonsea The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Thanks @sftim for this PR, please resolve the merge conflict. |
b3fe8c8
to
cb6e375
Compare
The changes look good to me, need a review from sig-auth. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Pull Request Overview
This PR refines the authentication reference documentation by updating wording and structure for clarity and consistency.
- Fixed/improved the page title and introduction
- Enhanced the structure of the content
- Added clarification on ServiceAccounts authentication details
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
small grammatical nits
(if you [extend Kubernetes with custom APIs](/docs/concepts/extend-kubernetes/api-extension/), | ||
then that is a different situation and you could use your own custom API for user management). | ||
|
||
Kubernetes is designed around an assumption that you have some mechanism to manage normal |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Kubernetes is designed around an assumption that you have some mechanism to manage normal | |
Kubernetes is designed around the assumption that you have some mechanism to manage normal |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Well, there are other assumptions.
Co-authored-by: Michael Yao <haifeng.yao@daocloud.io> Co-authored-by: Ritika <52399571+Ritikaa96@users.noreply.github.com>
68a87ef
to
62171b4
Compare
The PR LGTM. |
LGTM label has been added. Git tree hash: 7b69fc6050cc9c10e3eacbda67a86d90e36518be
|
Make https://kubernetes.io/docs/reference/access-authn-authz/authentication/ better [preview]
system:masters
is privilegedkubectl auth whoami
/sig auth
/language en