Skip to content

clarify support of new features across version-skewed clusters #12325

@liggitt

Description

@liggitt

Follow up from #11060, tracked in #12329

How users are expected to manage use of new features in version-skewed clusters is not clear in user-facing documentation:

  • what statement should be made about new features in version 1.x when running with a 1.x+ control plane and kubelets older than 1.x? is the user responsible for labeling nodes and workloads to only steer pods using those features to nodes with those capabilities? @kubernetes/sig-node-pr-reviews @kubernetes/sig-architecture-pr-reviews

Page to Update:
https://kubernetes.io/docs/setup/version-skew-policy/

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    kind/featureCategorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature.language/enIssues or PRs related to English languagelifecycle/rottenDenotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed.needs-triageIndicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one.priority/backlogHigher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence.sig/architectureCategorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Architecture.sig/nodeCategorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Node.wg/ltsCategorizes an issue or PR as relevant to WG LTS.

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions