Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add sig-docs-hi members #748

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 13, 2019
Merged

Conversation

mittalyashu
Copy link
Member

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. label Apr 20, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @mittalyashu. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. label Apr 20, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added sig/docs Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Docs. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Apr 20, 2019
@nikhita
Copy link
Member

nikhita commented Apr 20, 2019

/hold

OWNERS need to be added in the website repo first.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label Apr 20, 2019
@@ -86,6 +86,15 @@ teams:
- smana
- yastij
privacy: closed
sig-docs-hi-owners:
description: Admins for Hindi content
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@zacharysarah Two questions regarding this team:

  • What is the sig-docs-*-owners team meant for? Is it for pinging the team on PRs?

  • What does Admins for <language> content signify? Asking this because we've generally used descriptions as Admins for <repo> as a description to teams...where the said team would get admin access on the repo.

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@mittalyashu Please change the description to "Owners for Hindi content".

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Sure.

@nikhita
Copy link
Member

nikhita commented Apr 20, 2019

/assign @zacharysarah

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Apr 20, 2019
@zacharysarah
Copy link

@nikhita 👋

OWNERS need to be added in the website repo first.

Please feel free to assign me to any k/website PR for Hindi OWNERS updates.

@zacharysarah
Copy link

@nikhita 👋

What is the sig-docs-*-owners team meant for? Is it for pinging the team on PRs?

Yes, exactly. It's to create a GitHub team for the people specified in k/website/OWNERS_ALIASES—specifically, as invoked in k/website/content/hi/OWNERS.

What does Admins for content signify? Asking this because we've generally used descriptions as Admins for as a description to teams...where the said team would get admin access on the repo.

We don't give out admin repo access, so—would Approvers be more consistent? If so, we should change all relevant team descriptions to match.

@nikhita
Copy link
Member

nikhita commented Apr 28, 2019

We don't give out admin repo access, so—would Approvers be more consistent? If so, we should change all relevant team descriptions to match.

Yeah, I guess that would be cleaner. :)

@mittalyashu
Copy link
Member Author

Do I also have to add the name of the docs localization admin?

  sig-docs-l10n-admins:
    description: Admins for localization projects
    members:
    - alexbrand # Spanish
    - bradamant3 # English
    - ClaudiaJKang # Korean
    - cstoku # Japanese
    - femrtnz # Portuguese
    - girikuncoro # Indonesian
    - gochist # Korean
    - hanjiayao # Chinese
    - irvifa # Indonesian
    - jaredbhatti # English 
    - jcjesus # Portuguese
    - markthink # Chinese
    - micheleberardi # Italian
    - raelga # Spanish
    - remyleone # French
    - rlenferink # Italian
    - tnir # Japanese
    - zacharysarah # English
    - zhangxiaoyu-zidif # Chinese
    privacy: closed

@zacharysarah
Copy link

@mittalyashu

Do I also have to add the name of the docs localization admin?

Yes please.

@mittalyashu
Copy link
Member Author

Roger that.

@zacharysarah
Copy link

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels May 1, 2019
@zacharysarah
Copy link

@mittalyashu From the test log:

config_test.go:248: The team sig-docs-l10n-admins in org Kubernetes has an unsorted list of members
config_test.go:248: The team sig-docs-hi-owners in org Kubernetes has an unsorted list of members
config_test.go:248: The team sig-docs-hi-reviews in org Kubernetes has an unsorted list of members

Please alphabetize your lists.

@mittalyashu
Copy link
Member Author

Done

@mrbobbytables
Copy link
Member

The group sig-docs-l10n-admins is not alphabetized. Once that is done it should pass all the tests 😄

One last little thing after that, would you mind squashing your commits down? We try and keep the git history in k/org as clean as possible 👍

Thanks!

@zacharysarah
Copy link

/ok-to-retest

@zacharysarah
Copy link

Now that kubernetes/website#13910 has merged, I think it's OK to lift the hold.

/hold cancel

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. label May 8, 2019
@zacharysarah
Copy link

/test pull-org-test-all

@nikhita
Copy link
Member

nikhita commented May 13, 2019

/uncc
/cc @mittalyashu

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@nikhita: GitHub didn't allow me to request PR reviews from the following users: mittalyashu.

Note that only kubernetes members and repo collaborators can review this PR, and authors cannot review their own PRs.

In response to this:

/uncc
/cc @mittalyashu

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@nikhita
Copy link
Member

nikhita commented May 13, 2019

oooops, wrong PR. too many windows open. 🤦‍♀️

@mittalyashu
Copy link
Member Author

I have made the required changes, plz take forward @zacharysarah.

@nikhita
Copy link
Member

nikhita commented May 13, 2019

@mittalyashu can you squash the commits into a single commit :)

* Create localization team for hindi
* Add daminisatya & Rajakavitha1 to sig-docs-hi
* Add hindi admin name in sig-docs-l10n-admins
* Remove duplicate name
@mittalyashu
Copy link
Member Author

Thank you @raelga for helping out with squashing commits.

@zacharysarah
Copy link

/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label May 13, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mittalyashu, zacharysarah

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label May 13, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit b495745 into kubernetes:master May 13, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. sig/docs Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Docs. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants