wip: Improve minikube tunnel output

[RA489]

Improve minikube tunnel output
fixes #6309

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: RA489

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [RA489]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[medyagh]

Thank you for the pr. Could you please put the output in the pr description before and after this pr ?

[RA489]

@medyagh Before output was following:

Status:
		machine: minikube
		pid: 22890
		route: 10.96.0.0/12 -> 10.0.7.230
		minikube: Running
		services: []
	    errors:
			minikube: no errors
			router: no errors
			loadbalancer emulator: no errors

[RA489]

After this PR output was following:

Status:
		machine: minikube
		pid: 22890
		route: 10.96.0.0/12 -> 10.0.7.230
		minikube: Running
		services: []
	    errors:
			minikube: no errors
			router: no errors
			loadbalancer emulator: Get https://10.0.7.230:8443/api/v1/services: net/http: request canceled (Client.Timeout exceeded while awaiting headers)

[tstromberg]

We have some change-detector unit tests that you will need to update before we can merge this PR. Please run make test and take a look.

[medyagh]

@RA489 the output should not show any errors if there is no errors. this PR needs more work I will mark this as WIP

[RA489]

@medyagh Currently in this PR if there is no error in all three like below it will skip printing below output.

errors:
			minikube: no errors
			router: no errors
			loadbalancer emulator: no error

[RA489]

@RA489 the output should not show any errors if there is no errors. this PR needs more work I will mark this as WIP

It is currently not printing anything if minikube: no errors router: no errors loadbalancer emulator: no error in all three.

Do you want me to show some msg instead?

[sharifelgamal]

@RA489 You should just suppress the errors portion of the output if there are no errors.