Kicbase/ISO: Update containerd from 2.1.4 to 2.2.0

[minikube-bot]

The containerd project released a new version

This PR was auto-generated by make update-containerd-version using update-containerd-version.yml CI Workflow.

[minikube-bot]

ok-to-build-image

[minikube-bot]

ok-to-build-iso

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: minikube-bot
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign prezha for approval. For more information see the Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Details

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[k8s-ci-robot]

Hi @minikube-bot. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a github.com member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

[minikube-bot]

Hi @minikube-bot, we have updated your PR with the reference to newly built kicbase image. Pull the changes locally if you want to test with them or update your PR further.

[nirs]

/ok-to-build-iso

[minikube-bot]

Hi @minikube-bot, we have updated your PR with the reference to newly built ISO. Pull the changes locally if you want to test with them or update your PR further.

[nirs]

/ok-to-test

[nirs]

KVM tests failed - seems that we have real issue with latest containerd:

• KVM_Linux
  KVM_Linux — Jenkins: completed with 3 / 452 failures in 74.26 minutes.
• KVM_Linux_containerd
  KVM_Linux_containerd — Jenkins: completed with 1 / 437 failures in 66.55 minutes.

[nirs]

/retest

[nirs]

/ok-to-test

[minikube-bot]

Hi @minikube-bot, we have updated your PR with the reference to newly built ISO. Pull the changes locally if you want to test with them or update your PR further.

[minikube-pr-bot]

kvm2 driver with docker runtime

┌────────────────┬──────────┬────────────────────────┐
│    COMMAND     │ MINIKUBE │ MINIKUBE  ( PR 22141 ) │
├────────────────┼──────────┼────────────────────────┤
│ minikube start │ 42.2s    │ 42.9s                  │
│ enable ingress │ 16.7s    │ 16.3s                  │
└────────────────┴──────────┴────────────────────────┘

Details

Times for minikube ingress: 16.9s 16.8s 16.8s 16.9s 15.9s
Times for minikube (PR 22141) ingress: 15.9s 15.8s 16.9s 15.9s 16.8s

Times for minikube start: 41.5s 40.4s 43.9s 42.7s 42.6s
Times for minikube (PR 22141) start: 42.2s 41.1s 45.0s 43.2s 43.1s

docker driver with docker runtime

┌────────────────┬──────────┬────────────────────────┐
│    COMMAND     │ MINIKUBE │ MINIKUBE  ( PR 22141 ) │
├────────────────┼──────────┼────────────────────────┤
│ minikube start │ 24.7s    │ 23.7s                  │
│ enable ingress │ 17.1s    │ 17.1s                  │
└────────────────┴──────────┴────────────────────────┘

Details

Times for minikube start: 24.5s 24.9s 24.9s 25.2s 24.0s
Times for minikube (PR 22141) start: 24.5s 25.9s 21.1s 25.6s 21.3s

Times for minikube ingress: 10.7s 11.7s 10.7s 10.7s 41.7s
Times for minikube (PR 22141) ingress: 41.7s 10.7s 10.7s 11.8s 10.7s

docker driver with containerd runtime

┌────────────────┬──────────┬────────────────────────┐
│    COMMAND     │ MINIKUBE │ MINIKUBE  ( PR 22141 ) │
├────────────────┼──────────┼────────────────────────┤
│ minikube start │ 20.9s    │ 20.3s                  │
│ enable ingress │ 26.4s    │ 20.4s                  │
└────────────────┴──────────┴────────────────────────┘

Details

Times for minikube (PR 22141) ingress: 20.2s 20.2s 21.2s 20.2s 20.2s
Times for minikube ingress: 20.2s 20.2s 50.1s 20.2s 21.2s

Times for minikube start: 23.5s 21.6s 18.0s 22.2s 19.3s
Times for minikube (PR 22141) start: 19.2s 19.1s 18.5s 23.2s 21.8s

[k8s-ci-robot]

@minikube-bot: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name	Commit	Details	Required	Rerun command
integration-vfkit-docker-macos-arm64	2191194	link	false	/test integration-vfkit-docker-macos-arm64
integration-docker-crio-linux-x86-64	2191194	link	true	/test integration-docker-crio-linux-x86-64
integration-kvm-docker-linux-x86-64	2191194	link	true	/test integration-kvm-docker-linux-x86-64
integration-kvm-crio-linux-x86-64	2191194	link	true	/test integration-kvm-crio-linux-x86-64

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Details

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

[minikube-pr-bot]

Here are the number of top 10 failed tests in each environments with lowest flake rate.

Environment	Test Name	Flake Rate
KVM_Linux (9 failed)	TestISOImage/PersistentMounts//data(gopogh)	Unknown
KVM_Linux (9 failed)	TestISOImage/PersistentMounts//var/lib/docker(gopogh)	Unknown
KVM_Linux (9 failed)	TestISOImage/PersistentMounts//var/lib/cni(gopogh)	Unknown
KVM_Linux (9 failed)	TestISOImage/PersistentMounts//var/lib/kubelet(gopogh)	Unknown
KVM_Linux (9 failed)	TestISOImage/PersistentMounts//var/lib/minikube(gopogh)	Unknown
KVM_Linux (9 failed)	TestISOImage/PersistentMounts//var/lib/toolbox(gopogh)	Unknown
KVM_Linux (9 failed)	TestISOImage/PersistentMounts//var/lib/boot2docker(gopogh)	Unknown
KVM_Linux (9 failed)	TestISOImage/VersionJSON(gopogh)	Unknown
KVM_Linux (9 failed)	TestISOImage/eBPFSupport(gopogh)	Unknown
Docker_Linux (1 failed)	TestFunctional/parallel/MountCmd/specific-port(gopogh)	0.00% (chart)

Besides the following environments also have failed tests:

• Docker_Windows: 34 failed (gopogh)

• KVM_Linux_crio: 3 failed (gopogh)

• Docker_Linux_containerd_arm64: 34 failed (gopogh)

• Docker_Linux_crio: 30 failed (gopogh)

• Docker_Linux_crio_arm64: 43 failed (gopogh)

To see the flake rates of all tests by environment, click here.