-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 39.7k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Move e2e ingress test manifests for GCE to a subdirectory #72092
Move e2e ingress test manifests for GCE to a subdirectory #72092
Conversation
Update vllry/kubernetes with upstream changes
Hi @vllry. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. |
/sig network |
/assign @eparis |
/priority backlog |
/ok-to-test |
/retest |
Tests were indeed a flake, just need lgtm + approval. 😁 |
Manifests of static-ip-2 are used only for e2e tests of gce/gke. So /lgtm |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@vllry Thanks for rebasing, just one comment
test/e2e/upgrades/ingress.go
Outdated
@@ -95,10 +95,9 @@ func (t *IngressUpgradeTest) Setup(f *framework.Framework) { | |||
// Allocate a static-ip for the Ingress, this IP is cleaned up via CleanupGCEIngressController | |||
t.ipName = fmt.Sprintf("%s-static-ip", ns.Name) | |||
t.ip = t.gceController.CreateStaticIP(t.ipName) | |||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This seems unnecessary change here for readability.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
👍
Thanks for updating, /lgtm |
Thanks, still need a |
I don't have power of approval. |
/assign @spiffxp @mikedanese |
/approve |
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: spiffxp, vllry The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
What type of PR is this?
/kind cleanup
What this PR does / why we need it:
The GCE-specific ingress manifest resources were organized inconsistently compared to the nginx-specific ones (which live in a subdirectory). This PR moves the GCE
static-ip-2
assets to agce
directory, and updates path references.Which issue(s) this PR fixes:
Fixes #58640
Special notes for your reviewer:
This is my first kubernetes/kubernetes PR, so please let me know if I've made an obvious or beginner's mistake.
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?: