Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Move e2e ingress test manifests for GCE to a subdirectory #72092

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Mar 13, 2019

Conversation

vllry
Copy link
Contributor

@vllry vllry commented Dec 17, 2018

What type of PR is this?
/kind cleanup

What this PR does / why we need it:
The GCE-specific ingress manifest resources were organized inconsistently compared to the nginx-specific ones (which live in a subdirectory). This PR moves the GCE static-ip-2 assets to a gce directory, and updates path references.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #58640

Special notes for your reviewer:
This is my first kubernetes/kubernetes PR, so please let me know if I've made an obvious or beginner's mistake.

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

NONE

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. labels Dec 17, 2018
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @vllry. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing. and removed needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. labels Dec 17, 2018
@vllry
Copy link
Contributor Author

vllry commented Dec 17, 2018

/sig network

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the sig/network Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Network. label Dec 17, 2018
@vllry
Copy link
Contributor Author

vllry commented Dec 17, 2018

/assign @eparis

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. and removed do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. labels Dec 17, 2018
@vllry
Copy link
Contributor Author

vllry commented Dec 17, 2018

/priority backlog

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added priority/backlog Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence. and removed needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. labels Dec 17, 2018
@jdumars
Copy link
Member

jdumars commented Dec 17, 2018

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Dec 17, 2018
@BenTheElder
Copy link
Member

/retest
TestTerminalPodEviction flakes strike again! :(

@vllry
Copy link
Contributor Author

vllry commented Dec 17, 2018

Tests were indeed a flake, just need lgtm + approval. 😁

@oomichi
Copy link
Member

oomichi commented Jan 15, 2019

Manifests of static-ip-2 are used only for e2e tests of gce/gke. So

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jan 15, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Mar 1, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. labels Mar 1, 2019
@vllry
Copy link
Contributor Author

vllry commented Mar 1, 2019

@thockin @oomichi @eparis This PR is pretty old + small, would appreciate a review (or if you could toss in a different reviewer)

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. and removed size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Mar 1, 2019
Copy link
Member

@oomichi oomichi left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@vllry Thanks for rebasing, just one comment

@@ -95,10 +95,9 @@ func (t *IngressUpgradeTest) Setup(f *framework.Framework) {
// Allocate a static-ip for the Ingress, this IP is cleaned up via CleanupGCEIngressController
t.ipName = fmt.Sprintf("%s-static-ip", ns.Name)
t.ip = t.gceController.CreateStaticIP(t.ipName)

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This seems unnecessary change here for readability.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@oomichi
Copy link
Member

oomichi commented Mar 1, 2019

Thanks for updating,

/lgtm

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Mar 1, 2019
@vllry
Copy link
Contributor Author

vllry commented Mar 1, 2019

Thanks, still need a /approve.

@vllry
Copy link
Contributor Author

vllry commented Mar 7, 2019

@oomichi @eparis

@oomichi
Copy link
Member

oomichi commented Mar 8, 2019

I don't have power of approval.
@spiffxp Could you take a look at this?

@dims
Copy link
Member

dims commented Mar 13, 2019

/assign @spiffxp @mikedanese
/milestone v1.14

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.14 milestone Mar 13, 2019
@spiffxp
Copy link
Member

spiffxp commented Mar 13, 2019

/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: spiffxp, vllry

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Mar 13, 2019
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 118e33d into kubernetes:master Mar 13, 2019
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/cleanup Categorizes issue or PR as related to cleaning up code, process, or technical debt. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. priority/backlog Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence. release-note-none Denotes a PR that doesn't merit a release note. sig/network Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Network. sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Manifests in test/e2e/testing-manifests/ingress related to GCE should be in a separate folder.
9 participants