Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fixed typo "permanen" #5971

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Aug 4, 2020
Merged

Conversation

ryanwilsonperkin
Copy link
Contributor

What this PR does / why we need it:

Fixed the use of the name "permanen-redirect" instead of "permanent-redirect" in some annotations for this test

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)

Which issue/s this PR fixes

How Has This Been Tested?

It has not, I am new to this project and would be happy to test it if need be, but it does not seem to be something that would necessarily need it (unless changed annotations break part of the test system)

Checklist:

  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I've read the CONTRIBUTION guide
  • I have added tests to cover my changes.
  • All new and existing tests passed.

Noticed the use of the name "permanen-redirect" instead of "permanent-redirect" in some annotations for this test
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for your pull request. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

📝 Please follow instructions at https://git.k8s.io/community/CLA.md#the-contributor-license-agreement to sign the CLA.

It may take a couple minutes for the CLA signature to be fully registered; after that, please reply here with a new comment and we'll verify. Thanks.


Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. label Aug 4, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @ryanwilsonperkin!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes/ingress-nginx 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes/ingress-nginx has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @ryanwilsonperkin. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Aug 4, 2020
@aledbf
Copy link
Member

aledbf commented Aug 4, 2020

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Aug 4, 2020
@aledbf
Copy link
Member

aledbf commented Aug 4, 2020

/check-cla

@aledbf
Copy link
Member

aledbf commented Aug 4, 2020

@ryanwilsonperkin please sign the CLA

@codecov-commenter
Copy link

Codecov Report

Merging #5971 into master will increase coverage by 0.06%.
The diff coverage is 53.12%.

Impacted file tree graph

@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master    #5971      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   58.65%   58.71%   +0.06%     
==========================================
  Files          88       88              
  Lines        6951     6966      +15     
==========================================
+ Hits         4077     4090      +13     
- Misses       2425     2427       +2     
  Partials      449      449              
Impacted Files Coverage Δ
cmd/nginx/main.go 5.37% <0.00%> (ø)
internal/ingress/annotations/class/main.go 54.54% <ø> (ø)
internal/ingress/controller/controller.go 49.41% <0.00%> (-0.18%) ⬇️
internal/ingress/types.go 0.00% <ø> (ø)
internal/watch/file_watcher.go 84.61% <ø> (ø)
internal/ingress/controller/nginx.go 30.10% <50.00%> (+0.10%) ⬆️
internal/ingress/controller/store/store.go 58.57% <50.00%> (-0.20%) ⬇️
cmd/nginx/flags.go 82.56% <100.00%> (+0.18%) ⬆️
internal/ingress/annotations/proxyssl/main.go 95.65% <100.00%> (+0.33%) ⬆️
internal/ingress/controller/checker.go 39.13% <100.00%> (+3.41%) ⬆️
... and 2 more

Continue to review full report at Codecov.

Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact), ø = not affected, ? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update 3b31b9a...017a24f. Read the comment docs.

@ryanwilsonperkin
Copy link
Contributor Author

@ryanwilsonperkin please sign the CLA

@aledbf all done now 👍

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. and removed cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. labels Aug 4, 2020
@aledbf
Copy link
Member

aledbf commented Aug 4, 2020

/lgtm
/approve

@aledbf
Copy link
Member

aledbf commented Aug 4, 2020

@ryanwilsonperkin thanks!

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: aledbf, ryanwilsonperkin

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Aug 4, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit 030c15b into kubernetes:master Aug 4, 2020
@ryanwilsonperkin ryanwilsonperkin deleted the patch-1 branch August 4, 2020 20:29
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants