Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Chart: Implement controller.admissionWebhooks.service.servicePort. #11931

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Sep 4, 2024

Conversation

ralgozino
Copy link
Contributor

What this PR does / why we need it:

While the chart values.yaml provides a controller.admissionWebhooks.service.servicePort option, its value was being ignored by the chart template.

This PR changes the template to use the value for the admission webhook service port in the Service definition and in the corresponding ValidatingWebhookConfiguration instead of ignoring it.

The PR also adds some Helm unit tests for this value.

Types of changes

  • Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
  • New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
  • CVE Report (Scanner found CVE and adding report)
  • Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to change)
  • Documentation only

Which issue/s this PR fixes

How Has This Been Tested?

  • Manually tested that the change works as expected (service uses the custom port, webhook configuration point to the right port).
  • Launched make kind-e2e-chart-tests locally (mac M1): all tests passed
  • Launched helm unittest charts/ingress-nginx -d locally (mac M1): all tests passed.

Checklist:

  • My change requires a change to the documentation.
  • I have updated the documentation accordingly.
  • I've read the CONTRIBUTION guide
  • I have added unit and/or e2e tests to cover my changes.
  • All new and existing tests passed.

Copy link

linux-foundation-easycla bot commented Sep 4, 2024

CLA Signed

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

  • ✅ login: ralgozino / name: Ramiro Algozino (708df99)

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added area/helm Issues or PRs related to helm charts needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. labels Sep 4, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @ralgozino!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes/ingress-nginx 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes/ingress-nginx has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-kind Indicates a PR lacks a `kind/foo` label and requires one. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. needs-priority labels Sep 4, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @ralgozino. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

Copy link

netlify bot commented Sep 4, 2024

Deploy Preview for kubernetes-ingress-nginx canceled.

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 708df99
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/kubernetes-ingress-nginx/deploys/66d8b981ed54fb0009f6b29d

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. and removed cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. labels Sep 4, 2024
@Gacko
Copy link
Member

Gacko commented Sep 4, 2024

/triage accepted
/kind bug
/priority backlog
/hold

Thanks for your contribution! I'll review it later, hopefully! 🙂

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. priority/backlog Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence. and removed needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. needs-kind Indicates a PR lacks a `kind/foo` label and requires one. needs-priority labels Sep 4, 2024
@ralgozino
Copy link
Contributor Author

thank you @Gacko

This is my first contribution to the project, please let me know if I missed anything and I'll happily fix it :-)

Have a nice day!

@Gacko Gacko changed the title Chart: use admissionWebhooks.service.servicePort value Chart: Implement controller.admissionWebhooks.service.servicePort. Sep 4, 2024
@Gacko
Copy link
Member

Gacko commented Sep 4, 2024

/ok-to-test
/lgtm
/unhold

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. label Sep 4, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed do-not-merge/hold Indicates that a PR should not merge because someone has issued a /hold command. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Sep 4, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Sep 4, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Gacko, ralgozino

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Sep 4, 2024
@Gacko
Copy link
Member

Gacko commented Sep 4, 2024

Ciao!

Since you enabled the option for maintainers to edit your fork, I implemented a few improvements, mainly around the tests, and rebased your branch. Apart from that, your proposal looks good and is ready to be merged.

Mille grazie e buona serata!

@Gacko
Copy link
Member

Gacko commented Sep 4, 2024

/cherry-pick release-1.10

@Gacko
Copy link
Member

Gacko commented Sep 4, 2024

/cherry-pick release-1.11

@k8s-infra-cherrypick-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@Gacko: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-1.10 in a new PR and assign it to you.

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-1.10

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-infra-cherrypick-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@Gacko: once the present PR merges, I will cherry-pick it on top of release-1.11 in a new PR and assign it to you.

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-1.11

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit a647bc1 into kubernetes:main Sep 4, 2024
32 checks passed
@k8s-infra-cherrypick-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@Gacko: new pull request created: #11933

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-1.10

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-infra-cherrypick-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@Gacko: new pull request created: #11934

In response to this:

/cherry-pick release-1.11

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@ralgozino
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ciao!

Since you enabled the option for maintainers to edit your fork, I implemented a few improvements, mainly around the tests, and rebased your branch. Apart from that, your proposal looks good and is ready to be merged.

Mille grazie e buona serata!

Thank you for the feedback. I saw your changes, they make a lot of sense.

Buona giornata and see you in the next PR :-)

@ralgozino ralgozino deleted the fix/chart-servicePort branch September 5, 2024 07:43
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. area/helm Issues or PRs related to helm charts cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. priority/backlog Higher priority than priority/awaiting-more-evidence. size/M Denotes a PR that changes 30-99 lines, ignoring generated files. triage/accepted Indicates an issue or PR is ready to be actively worked on.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants