Installing tools on Linux

[harshitghagre]

Add installation steps for more Linux distributions /sig node

The documentation includes installation steps for Ubuntu, Fedora, Arch, and OpenSUSE, but it does not cover Alpine Linux and other common distributions. Please add installation instructions for Alpine Linux and more Linux distributions like Clear Linux, Solus, and Mageia.

[utkarsh-singh1]

There are more Linux distributions like void and gentoo etc. too, we should add information about relevant packages based on their usage in general day to dau use case.

[utkarsh-singh1]

Example - ubuntu, fedora and opensuse (SUSE) have their own versions for server usage too, and arch is a very popular distro and many people use it daily. We could use alpine linux in the docs due to being very lightweight.

[utkarsh-singh1]

Or if there is any third party repository locator like repology, we can mention it as additional link to browse to install particular package in their distro.

[harshitghagre]

hi @utkarsh-singh1 ,
could you check #8379 it had alpine linux, clear linux and solus linux i

[SergeyKanzhelev]

/sig contributor-experience

I am not sure what is the list of distros contrib experience want to keep instructions for.

[cdacosta512]

hi @utkarsh-singh1 ,
could you check #8379 it had alpine linux, clear linux and solus linux i

Does this meet the AC? @SergeyKanzhelev @utkarsh-singh1

Please confirm so we can either add the steps or get this PR attached to the issue and reviewed.

[BenTheElder]

I'm concerned about keeping this up to date.

On a certain level it is not reasonable to cater to ever distro, these are just examples for setting up the development environment.

I don't think we should add instructions just because distros exist without evidence of widespread demand. They will just bitrot and provide a false sense of support.

[Gourav2580]

/assign

[cdacosta512]

I agree with this sentiment @BenTheElder — we should avoid trying to cater to every distribution out there. The current examples (Ubuntu, Fedora, Arch, and OpenSUSE) strike a good balance between popularity and diversity of package ecosystems. Adding more without clear demand risks unnecessary maintenance burden and potential confusion for new contributors. Let's keep the focus on these well-established distros unless there's strong evidence of community interest or contribution.