Skip to content

Need more active response from owners and members #4296

Closed
@Colstuwjx

Description

@Colstuwjx

There are lots of issues lost response and inactive from community, for example, issues from kubespray, more than 30% percent issues don't have any response.

And some PRs, for example ( I just take the example from our repo pool, it's NOT the ONLY one ), like this PR, some members gave LGTM, and it's blocked by blog reviewer.

I know we're all spending our time to do such open source job, and it's reasonable to away from community jobs due to busy business job. But it hurts our users, since these issues don't have any response from community, we could close it if it's NOT reasonable, OR we could hold it if we could NOT fix it currently, but we should do more active response. As well as the PRs, we give LGTM, and story ends...

I hope our community could give some active response about such things, and maybe we could setup some rules for this, like let someone be emeritus approver if he/she is away from our community too long time or rotate the oncall member, let issue and PR could have response, even it is CLOSE/REJECT.

Thanks.

Metadata

Metadata

Assignees

No one assigned

    Labels

    lifecycle/rottenDenotes an issue or PR that has aged beyond stale and will be auto-closed.sig/contributor-experienceCategorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Contributor Experience.

    Type

    No type

    Projects

    No projects

    Milestone

    No milestone

    Relationships

    None yet

    Development

    No branches or pull requests

    Issue actions