Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add option to skip similar nodegroup recomputation #6926

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

rrangith
Copy link
Contributor

@rrangith rrangith commented Jun 14, 2024

What type of PR is this?

/kind feature

What this PR does / why we need it:

Related to #6940

This recomputation used to only occur when the bestOption NodeGroup did not exist, but was changed in #5802. There are cases where an expander could modify the bestOption's similar nodegroups, such as custom logic in the gRPC expander.

In cases like this, we should have a CLI option to trust expander’s similar nodegroups and skip the recomputation.

If a user does not enable this option, then by default the behaviour will stay the same. This will only skip similar nodegroup recomputation for users who enable this option.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

Added `skip-similar-node-group-recomputation` flag. If enabled, skips similar NodeGroup recomputation for the best option returned by the expander during scaleup.

Additional documentation e.g., KEPs (Kubernetes Enhancement Proposals), usage docs, etc.:


@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels Jun 14, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @rrangith. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added area/cluster-autoscaler size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files. labels Jun 14, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Jul 12, 2024
@k8s-triage-robot
Copy link

The Kubernetes project currently lacks enough contributors to adequately respond to all PRs.

This bot triages PRs according to the following rules:

  • After 90d of inactivity, lifecycle/stale is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/stale was applied, lifecycle/rotten is applied
  • After 30d of inactivity since lifecycle/rotten was applied, the PR is closed

You can:

  • Mark this PR as fresh with /remove-lifecycle stale
  • Close this PR with /close
  • Offer to help out with Issue Triage

Please send feedback to sig-contributor-experience at kubernetes/community.

/lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Oct 10, 2024
@rrangith rrangith force-pushed the skip-similar-nodegroup-recomputation branch from 32774c7 to 450a753 Compare November 6, 2024 21:11
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the needs-rebase Indicates a PR cannot be merged because it has merge conflicts with HEAD. label Nov 6, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: rrangith
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign x13n for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@rrangith rrangith force-pushed the skip-similar-nodegroup-recomputation branch from 450a753 to 35c514d Compare November 6, 2024 21:14
@rrangith
Copy link
Contributor Author

rrangith commented Nov 6, 2024

/remove-lifecycle stale

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot removed the lifecycle/stale Denotes an issue or PR has remained open with no activity and has become stale. label Nov 6, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
area/cluster-autoscaler cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/feature Categorizes issue or PR as related to a new feature. needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. size/S Denotes a PR that changes 10-29 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants