Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Modify the populate no_proxy task to use a combine rather than relyin… #6112

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 28, 2020

Conversation

codyseavey
Copy link
Contributor

What type of PR is this?

Uncomment only one /kind <> line, hit enter to put that in a new line, and remove leading whitespaces from that line:

/kind api-change

/kind bug

/kind cleanup
/kind design
/kind documentation
/kind failing-test
/kind feature
/kind flake

What this PR does / why we need it:
Currently deploying a cluster using an explicit proxy doesn't work ever since 2.13.0 was released.

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #6108

Special notes for your reviewer:
Previously the no_proxy.yaml would unset the http_proxy, https_proxy, HTTP_PROXY and HTTPS_PROXY variables due to ansibles DEFAULT_HASH_BEHAVIOR setting being set to replace rather than merge. A combine would make it so it works regardless of what the hash behavior setting is set to.

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

NONE

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. label May 8, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Thanks for your pull request. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

📝 Please follow instructions at https://git.k8s.io/community/CLA.md#the-contributor-license-agreement to sign the CLA.

It may take a couple minutes for the CLA signature to be fully registered; after that, please reply here with a new comment and we'll verify. Thanks.


Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. label May 8, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot requested review from bozzo and floryut May 8, 2020 22:58
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Welcome @codyseavey!

It looks like this is your first PR to kubernetes-sigs/kubespray 🎉. Please refer to our pull request process documentation to help your PR have a smooth ride to approval.

You will be prompted by a bot to use commands during the review process. Do not be afraid to follow the prompts! It is okay to experiment. Here is the bot commands documentation.

You can also check if kubernetes-sigs/kubespray has its own contribution guidelines.

You may want to refer to our testing guide if you run into trouble with your tests not passing.

If you are having difficulty getting your pull request seen, please follow the recommended escalation practices. Also, for tips and tricks in the contribution process you may want to read the Kubernetes contributor cheat sheet. We want to make sure your contribution gets all the attention it needs!

Thank you, and welcome to Kubernetes. 😃

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Hi @codyseavey. Thanks for your PR.

I'm waiting for a kubernetes-sigs member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with /ok-to-test on its own line. Until that is done, I will not automatically test new commits in this PR, but the usual testing commands by org members will still work. Regular contributors should join the org to skip this step.

Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the ok-to-test label.

I understand the commands that are listed here.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes/test-infra repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels May 8, 2020
@codyseavey
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks for your pull request. Before we can look at your pull request, you'll need to sign a Contributor License Agreement (CLA).

📝 Please follow instructions at https://git.k8s.io/community/CLA.md#the-contributor-license-agreement to sign the CLA.

It may take a couple minutes for the CLA signature to be fully registered; after that, please reply here with a new comment and we'll verify. Thanks.

I have signed the CLA now.

@codyseavey
Copy link
Contributor Author

/check-cla

@billykwooten
Copy link

Can confirm this fixes the proxy issues referenced in #6108

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. and removed cncf-cla: no Indicates the PR's author has not signed the CNCF CLA. labels May 8, 2020
@codyseavey
Copy link
Contributor Author

/assign @mirwan

@LuckySB
Copy link
Contributor

LuckySB commented May 10, 2020

/ok-to-test

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. and removed needs-ok-to-test Indicates a PR that requires an org member to verify it is safe to test. labels May 10, 2020
@floryut
Copy link
Member

floryut commented May 10, 2020

@codyseavey can you please rebase master ? tf_ovh_xxx are broken and removed :)

…g on the hash_behaviour setting to be set to merge rather than replace
@przemeklal
Copy link

Hi, are there any updates regarding this PR? It fixed a no_proxy related issue I had with this task on Ubuntu 18.04 and 20.04.

@floryut
Copy link
Member

floryut commented May 26, 2020

Hi, are there any updates regarding this PR? It fixed a no_proxy related issue I had with this task on Ubuntu 18.04 and 20.04.

Looks good on my end, @Miouge1 @EppO @LuckySB WDYT ?

@LuckySB
Copy link
Contributor

LuckySB commented May 28, 2020

Thanks for the good solution.
/lgtm
/approve

@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: codyseavey, LuckySB

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels May 28, 2020
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot merged commit b6e21a1 into kubernetes-sigs:master May 28, 2020
LuckySB pushed a commit to southbridgeio/kubespray that referenced this pull request May 29, 2020
…g on the hash_behaviour setting to be set to merge rather than replace (kubernetes-sigs#6112)
k8s-ci-robot pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jul 7, 2020
…g on the hash_behaviour setting to be set to merge rather than replace (#6112) (#6346)

Co-authored-by: Cody Seavey <seavey.cody@gmail.com>
@floryut floryut mentioned this pull request Aug 14, 2020
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. kind/bug Categorizes issue or PR as related to a bug. lgtm "Looks good to me", indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. ok-to-test Indicates a non-member PR verified by an org member that is safe to test. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

proxies break due to changes in 2.13.0
7 participants