[2.22] Add k8s patches version, default to 1.26.13

[VannTen]

What type of PR is this?
/kind feature

What this PR does / why we need it:

Make kubernetes 1.26.13 default, add last patch versions for all supported major versions

Which issue(s) this PR fixes:

Fixes #10333

Special notes for your reviewer:

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?:

Make kubernetes 1.26.13 the default version

[VannTen]

/cc @MrFreezeex
We need to automate that stuff.... I wonder if Prow can do PRs itself ? 🤔

[VannTen]

/cc @mzaian

[floryut]

/cc @MrFreezeex We need to automate that stuff.... I wonder if Prow can do PRs itself ? 🤔

Agreed, that's really something that we are missing, some kind of label to automate backport to n-x branches

[MrFreezeex]

/lgtm

[MrFreezeex]

We should most likely have a way to track backport but not sure if it would be sufficient here as there is a different default k8s version for each branch 🤔.

[mzaian]

I would say we should not be adding those hashes to prior releases If no CVEs or security related fixes. Or At least we supply them to 1 older release.

[mzaian]

/lgtm

[k8s-ci-robot]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: MrFreezeex, mzaian, VannTen

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

• OWNERS [mzaian]

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

[ErikJiang]

@VannTen Hello, may I ask if this file is redundant? The actual checksum information is stored in the roles/download/defaults/main.yml file. I'm not quite sure what the purpose of this new file is.

[VannTen]

Hum, yeah, not sure how this got there. 🤔

[ErikJiang]

😊Do you have time to verify if this file is useless? If it is, I suggest removing it. Thank you very much.🤝

[VannTen]

Hum it does not appear to be in release-2.22 though.. 🤔